MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2973777064 · doi:10.1101/768473

Discovery and characterization of a Gram-positive Pel polysaccharide biosynthetic gene cluster

2019· preprint· en· W2973777064 on OpenAlexafffund
Gregory B. Whitfield, Lindsey S. Marmont, Cedoljub Bundalovic-Torma, Erum Razvi, Elyse J. Roach, Cezar M. Khursigara, John Parkinson, P. Lynne Howell

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2019
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHospital for Sick ChildrenNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaSick Kids FoundationCystic Fibrosis Canada
KeywordsOperonBiofilmBiologyGene clusterPentamerCereusMicrobiologyGeneBacillus cereusPseudomonas aeruginosaBacteriaBiochemistryGeneticsEscherichia coli

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Our understanding of the biofilm matrix components utilized by Gram-positive bacteria, and the signalling pathways that regulate their production are largely unknown. In a companion study, we developed a computational pipeline for the unbiased identification of homologous bacterial operons and applied this algorithm to the analysis of synthase-dependent exopolysaccharide biosynthetic systems ( https://doi.org/10.1101/769745 ). Here, we explore the finding that many species of Gram-positive bacteria have operons with similarity to the Pseudomonas aeruginosa pel locus. Our characterization of the pelDEA DA FG operon from Bacillus cereus ATCC 10987, presented herein, demonstrates that this locus is required for biofilm formation and produces a polysaccharide structurally similar to Pel. We show that the degenerate GGDEF domain of the B. cereus PelD ortholog binds cyclic-3’,5’-dimeric guanosine monophosphate (c-di-GMP), and that this binding is required for biofilm formation. Finally, we identify a diguanylate cyclase, CdgF, and a c-di-GMP phosphodiesterase, CdgE, that reciprocally regulate the production of Pel. The discovery of this novel c-di-GMP regulatory circuit significantly contributes to our limited understanding of c-di-GMP signalling in Gram-positive organisms. Furthermore, conservation of the core pelDEA DA FG locus amongst many species of Bacilli, Clostridia, Streptococci, and Actinobacteria suggests that Pel may be a common biofilm matrix component in many Gram-positive bacteria. Author summary The Pel polysaccharide is required for biofilm formation in P. aeruginosa and we have previously found that the genes necessary for biosynthesis of this polymer are broadly distributed across Gram-negative bacteria. Herein, we show that many species of Gram-positive bacteria also possess Pel biosynthetic genes and demonstrate that these genes are used Bacillus cereus for biofilm formation. We show that Pel production in B. cereus is regulated by c-di-GMP and have identified two enzymes, a diguanylate cyclase, CdgF, and a phosphodiesterase, CdgE, that control the levels of this bacterial signalling molecule. While Pel production in B. cereus also requires the binding of c-di-GMP to the receptor PelD, the divergence of this protein in Streptococci suggests a c-di-GMP independent mechanism of regulation is used in this species. The discovery of a Pel biosynthetic gene cluster in Gram-positive bacteria and our characterization of the pel operon in B. cereus suggests that Pel is a widespread biofilm component across all bacteria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicBacterial biofilms and quorum sensing→French-language works237,207→