MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Prognostic value of an immune score combining intra- and peritumoral T-cell subset density in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

2013· article· en· W2973896058 on OpenAlexaff
Simon Turcotte, Yannic McNicoll, Geneviève Soucy, Louis Gaboury, Réal Lapointe, Franck Vandenbroucke‐Menu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalInstitute for Research in Immunology and CancerCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCD8Immune systemGastroenterologyInternal medicineT cellTissue microarrayAdenocarcinomaProportional hazards modelUnivariate analysisFOXP3PathologyImmunohistochemistryOncologyCancerMultivariate analysisImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

4060 Background: Immune scoring based on T-cell subsets and density can add prognostic value to conventional TNM staging for patients with solid tumors, but limited data are available for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Methods: Using tissue microarrays, CD3, CD4, CD8, CD45RO, and FOXP3 T-cells were quantified by immunohistochemistry in the intratumoral (IT) compartment and peritumoral (PT) parenchyma of 111 consecutively resected specimens. T-cell counts were correlated with patient overall survival, disease-free survival, and time to recurrence (OS, DFS, TTR) by Cox regression, controlling for clinicopathological factors. An immune score (IS) based on IT CD4 T-cell count > median, PT CD8 T-cell count ≤ median, and IT/PT CD3 T-cell ratio >1, grouped patients into high, intermediate, or low categories if all 3, 1 to 2, or none of these immune features were present, respectively. Results: Median follow-up time was 20 months, and 85% of patients either died or recurred during the study period. By univariate analysis, PT CD8 T-cell count was associated with shorter OS (p=0.02), whereas both IT CD4 T-cell count and IT/PT CD3 T-cell ratio were associated with longer OS (p=0.01 and p=0.05, respectively). Alone, none of these immune features predicted TTR. Combined into an IS, patients in the high (n=23), intermediate (n=60), or low (n=23) categories had significantly different OS (respective medians 30, 17, and 13 months, log-rank p=0.01), DFS (28, 16, and 12 months, p=0.01), and TTR (21, 14, and 10 months, p=0.02). By multivariate analysis, the association between IS and clinical outcomes was independent of tumor size, extra-pancreatic invasion, and nodal metastases (TNM staging). The IS discriminated outcomes among patients with nodal metastases (n=80), such that node-positive patients with a high IS had a median survival similar to node-negative patients (30 and 33 months, p=0.7). FOXP3 and CD45RO T-cell counts did not appear to add prognostic value to the IS. Conclusions: An immune score that combines specific T-cell location and density may have prognostic value in patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma, independently from pathologic features currently used for staging.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers→French-language works237,207→