MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2974146204 · doi:10.31487/j.scr.2018.03.110

Atypical presentation of a de Garengeot Hernia: A Case Report

2018· article· en· W2974146204 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jesse D. Pasternak, Megan Melland‐Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueSurgical Case Reports · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHernia repair and management
Canadian institutionsToronto General HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFemoral herniaAppendixHerniaGroinMedicinePresentation (obstetrics)Quadrant (abdomen)Acute appendicitisAppendicitisGeneral surgeryHernia repairSurgeryInguinal hernia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: An inflamed appendix found within a femoral hernia, a de Garengeot hernia, is a rare occurrence which can present with a variety of different symptoms and be a challenge to surgical management. Case Presentation: We present the case of a 59-year-old female who presented with migratory right lower quadrant pain and was found to have a de Garengeot hernia diagnosed pre-operatively on CT imaging. She was taken to the OR for an urgent laparoscopic appendectomy with closure of the femoral hernia sack. Given this is not a true repair, the patient was scheduled for an elective femoral hernia repair subsequently. Discussion: This is the first report of a de Garengeot hernia from the Toronto area. Our case is the first of its kind to present with typical signs of appendicitis without any obvious bulge in the groin. Conclusion: This case report describes two very common acute surgical presentations, appendicitis and incarcerated hernia, seen simultaneously with only one rare pathology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0050.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSurgical Case ReportsSame topicHernia repair and managementFrench-language works237,207