Experimental and numerical simulation of corrosion induced expansive pressure on concrete cover
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this research, an investigation was carried out through experimentation and numerical modeling to evaluate the cracking pressure induced due to corrosion of reinforcement for different cover thicknesses, grades of concrete and bar locations. The model was also used to determine the patterns of crack for a different number of bars and the effect of bar diameter on cracking pressure. The critical pressure was measured experimentally by applying hydraulic pressure through a hole in concrete cubes of 150 mm. Abaqus 6.14 was used as a modeling platform. From the experimentation and numerical modeling, it was found that with the increase of cover thickness the critical pressure was increased irrespective of bar locations. A lower cracking pressure was observed for corner bar with respect to the sidebar. On the other hand, with the increase in bar diameter, a decrease in cracking pressure was observed. The critical pressure observed was also increased with higher grades of concrete. For corner bars with cover thickness 37.5 mm, the critical pressure was found as 6-10 MPa and it increased up to 17 MPa for the cover thickness of 64 mm for different grades of concrete. On the other hand, for other bar location with the cover thickness of 37.5 mm and 64 mm, the pressure required to initiate crack was about 7.6 MPa and 14.8 MPa, respectively, for C20 grade concrete.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".