The inner junction complex of the cilia is an interaction hub that involves tubulin post-translational modifications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Microtubules are cytoskeletal structures involved in structural support, microtubule-based transport and the organization of organelles in the cells. The building blocks of the microtubule, the α- and β-tubulin heterodimers, polymerize into protofilaments, that associate laterally to form the hollow microtubule. There exists a specific type of microtubule structures in the cilia, termed doublet microtubules, where high stability is required for ciliary beating and function. The doublet microtubule, consisting of a complete A-tubule and a partial B-tubule maintains its stability through unique interactions at its outer and inner junctions, where the A- and B-tubules meet. Using cryo-electron microscopy, we present the answer to the long-standing question regarding the identities, localizations and structures of the Chlamydomonas doublet microtubule inner junction proteins. Using a combination of sequence bioinformatics and mass spectrometry, we identified two new inner junction proteins, FAP276 and FAP106, and an inner junction associated protein FAP126. We show that inner junction proteins PACRG and FAP20, together with FAP52, previously unidentified FAP276, FAP106 and FAP126, form an interaction hub at the inner junction, which involves tubulin sites for post-translational modifications. We further compare the Chlamydomonas and Tetrahymena doublet microtubule structures to understand the common and species-specific features of the inner junction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".