MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2974683174 · doi:10.1111/head.13644

Early Life Stress in Adolescent Migraine and the Mediational Influence of Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety in a Canadian Cohort

2019· article· en· W2974683174 on OpenAlexaffabout
Nicole G. Hammond, Serena L. Orr, Ian Colman

Bibliographic record

VenueHeadache The Journal of Head and Face Pain · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMigraine and Headache Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnxietyDepression (economics)MigraineStressorMedicineOdds ratioPopulationPsychologyLongitudinal studyGeneration RCohort studyCohortPsychiatryClinical psychologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective This study sought to examine the association between early life stressors and adolescent headache in the Canadian population, and the potential mediating influence of symptoms of depression and anxiety. Background Early life stress or adverse childhood experiences have a well‐documented association with migraine and headache in adulthood, as do symptoms of depression and anxiety. However, there is limited evidence examining the relationship between early life environmental stressors and adolescent headache, and a lack of longitudinal research. Family‐level factors including parenting behaviors and parental influences such as maternal distress have been implicated in pediatric chronic pain. Methods This study used data from 2313 respondents of the National Longitudinal Survey of Children and Youth, followed prospectively from age 0 to 1 years at baseline (1994/1995) until age 14 to 15 years (2008/2009). The relationships between 4 measures of early life family level stressors, and outcomes of incident health professional‐diagnosed migraine and self‐reported, unclassified frequent headache (>1 per week) were examined. We conducted a series of mediation analyses of the indirect effect (IE) of family‐level stressors on headache outcomes through symptoms of depression and anxiety in late childhood. The IE and 95% bias‐corrected confidence interval (CI BC ) were estimated using maximum likelihood logistic regression methods (log odds scale). Results The proportion of respondents with incident migraine and frequent headache was 3.1% and 11.1%, respectively. There were no direct associations between distal early life family‐level factors and adolescent headache. Symptoms of depression‐ and anxiety‐mediated relationships between family dysfunction (IE 0.0181, 95% CI BC 0.0001‐0.0570), punitive parenting (IE 0.0241, 95% CI BC 0.0015‐0.0633), parental depressive symptomatology (IE 0.0416, 95% CI BC 0.0017‐0.0861), and incident migraine but not frequent headache. Indirectly, presence of family dysfunction, punitive parenting, and higher parental depressive symptomatology in early life were associated with a greater likelihood of migraine in adolescence, through greater symptoms of depression and anxiety in late childhood. Conclusions Findings provide support for the influence of early life family‐level factors on prospective risk of developing migraine, through symptoms of depression and anxiety. Addressing family dynamics in clinical practice may reduce unnecessary stress‐related burdens on children and adolescents, which could lead to improvements in their somatic complaints.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.964

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHeadache The Journal of Head and Face PainSame topicMigraine and Headache StudiesFrench-language works237,207