Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction : Nous avons test l'effet du traitement multimodal, dfini comme cystectomie radicale avec chimiothrapie ou radiothrapie, sur la mortalit due au cancer chez les patients atteints de cancer non-urothlial de la vessie pT2-3 non mtastatique compar l'utilisation de la cystectomie radicale seule. Mthodes : Dans la base de donnes SEER, 887 les patients avec carcinome non-urothlial pT2-3 M0 ont t identifis. Des courbes Kaplan-Meier, des rgressions de Cox uni-et multivaries ont utilis pour les analyses de survie. Rsultats : Le carcinome neuroendocrine (NE) reprsentait 27.7% de notre population, alors que le carcinome pidermode et l'adnocarcinome -56.3% et 16.0%, respectivement. Le traitement multimodal tait plus frquent chez les patients atteints de NE (69.1%). Le taux de mortalit due au cancer 5 ans chez les patients avec NE tait significativement plus faible dans le sous-groupe trait avec approche multimodale versus ceux avec cystectomie radicale seule (37.0 vs 51.5%, p<0.01). Cet avantage n'a pas t observ chez les patients atteints de carcinome pidermode ni chez ceux atteints d'adnocarcinome. Dans les analyses multivaries, le traitement multimodal tait un facteur protecteur chez les patients atteints de NE (ratio des risques 0.58, p = 0.03). Conclusions : Seulement les patients atteints de NE bnficie d'un plus faible taux de mortalit avec l'utilisation du traitement par approche multimodale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.052 | 0.034 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".