MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2974727290 · doi:10.1049/pbcs071f_ch3

Load pull characterization

2019· book-chapter· en· W2974727290 on OpenAlexaff
C. Tsironis, T. Williams

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitution of Engineering and Technology eBooks · 2019
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D IC and TSV technologies
Canadian institutionsFocus Microwaves (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLoad pullActive loadNonlinear systemScalar (mathematics)Input impedanceHarmonicElectrical impedanceEngineeringElectronic engineeringStructural engineeringElectrical engineeringPhysicsAcousticsMathematicsAmplifierVoltageResistorGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Chapter begins with a discussion of the definition of load pull. It goes on to consider scalar and vector load pull, why load pull is needed, load pull methods, reflection on a variable passive load, injection of a coherent (active) signal, impedance tuners, harmonic load pull, fundamental versus harmonic load pull, on wafer integration, base-band load pull, active tuning, and data transfer into CAD and nonlinear models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.092

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.164
Teacher spread0.158 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInstitution of Engineering and Technology eBooksSame topic3D IC and TSV technologiesFrench-language works237,207