Role of Statins in Treatment and Prevention of Community-acquired Pneumonia:A Meta-analysis.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To systemically evaluate the the role of statins in prevention and treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Methods A computer-based searching was conducted in PubMed,EMbase,Cochrane Library,Wanfang,and CNKI database up to October 2016. Totally 21 eligible articles were retrieved. According to the Cochrane Handbook 5.0 or Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) quality evaluation criteria,two independent reviewers carried out literature screening,data retraction,and quality evaluation. Meta-analysis was conducted with RevMan 5.3 software. Results A total 1 007 765 CAP patients from 12 studies were divided into two groups:statin group (n=118 096) and non-statin group (n=889 669). Meta-analysis suggested that statin use was associated with decreased mortality of CAP (OR=0.67,95%CI:0.57-0.79). We further divided the studies into North America group and Europe group and found the heterogenicity of North America group was lower than that of Europe group,and the Meta-analysis of both group supported the association of statin use with decreased CAP mortality (OR=0.66,95%CI:0.62-0.67;OR=0.71,95%CI:0.55-0.92). To identify the effect of statin use on mechanical ventilation,we included three articles (n=123 645) for further analysis (statin group,n=23 796;non-statin group,n=99 849),and Meta-analysis suggested that statin use was associated with decreased requirement for mechanical ventilation (OR=0.74,95%CI:0.70-0.78). Four articles (n=127 060) were enrolled (statin group,n=24 121 and non-statin group,n=102 939) to analyze the effect of statin use on ICU admission,and Meta-analysis suggested that statin use was associated with decreased requirement for ICU admission (OR=0.85,95%CI:0.82-0.88). Eleven articles (n=2 124 849) (statin group,n=306 108;non-statin group,n=1 818 741) to evaluate the effect of statin use on risk of CAP,and Meta-analysis suggested that long-term use of statins decreased the risk of CAP,although there was no statistical difference (OR=0.85,95%CI:0.85-1.07); the above studies were divided into case-control studies and cohort studies,and the case-control studies revealed statins increased the risk of CAP (OR=1.12,95%CI:1.03-1.21),while the cohort studies supported the association of statin use with decreased CAP risk (OR=0.46,95%CI:0.44-0.49). Conclusions Statin use may decrease the CAP mortality and the requirement for mechanical ventilation or ICU admission. However,whether statin use can reduce the risk of pneumonia remains unclear.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.015 | 0.022 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.018 | 0.046 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".