Numerical and experimental investigation of impacts of nonlinear scattering encapsulated microbubbles on Nakagami distribution
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: The Nakagami statistical model and Nakagami shape parameter m have been widely used in linear tissue characterization and preliminarily characterized the envelope distributions of nonlinear encapsulated microbubbles (EMBs). However, the Nakagami distribution of nonlinear scattering EMBs lacked a systematical investigation. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the Nakagami distribution of EMBs and illustrate the impact of EMBs' nonlinearity on the Nakagami model. METHOD: A group of simulated EMB phantoms and in vitro EMB dilutions with an increasing concentration distribution under various EMB nonlinearities, as regulated by acoustic parameters, were characterized by using the window-modulated compounding Greenwood-Durand estimator. RESULTS: Raw envelope histograms of simulated and in vitro EMBs were well matched with the Nakagami distribution with a high correlation coefficient of 0.965 ± 0.021 (P < 0.005). The mean values and gradients of m parameters of simulated and in vitro EMBs were smaller than those of linear scatterers due to the stronger nonlinearity. These m values exhibited a quasi-linear improvement with the increase in second harmonic nonlinear-to-linear component ratio regulated by pulse lengths and excitation frequencies at low- and high-concentration conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The Nakagami distribution was suitable for the EMBs characterization but the corresponding m parameter was affected by the EMBs' nonlinearity. These validations provided support and nonlinear impact assessment for the EMBs' characterization using the Nakagami statistical model in the future.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".