The Effectiveness Analysis of Loxon Body Mask on Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cases Using a Rapid ARC Technique against the X, Y, and Z Coordinate On Board Imager in Radiation Therapy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Immobilization tools are used to reduce the movement during irradiation; one of the immobilization tools is Loxon Body Mask applied on the abdominal and pelvic regions. This study aimed to analyze the effectiveness of Loxon Body Mask against changes in X, Y and Z coordinates. The study took place in the Radiotherapy Installation of MRCCC Siloam Hospital Semanggi. Data were obtained from 10 secondary data samples of HCC patients with 20 times verification results consisting of X, Y, and Z coordinate values. Data on radiation area shift data were calculated to know the average and were analyzed graphically and statistically using one sample T-test. A shift at the X coordinate was 0.32 cm, Y coordinate was 0.20 cm, and Z coordinates was 0.34 cm. The application of Loxon Body Mask caused shifts in the radiation field; the causes could be imperfect mask application, the radiotherapy staff or the patients themselves.The average value of the shift in the radiation area in patients using Loxon Body Mask immobilization tool at X, Y, and Z coordinate was less than the tolerance value of 0.5 cm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".