MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Inter-Turn Short-Circuit Failure of PMSM Indicator based on Kalman Filtering in Operational Behavior

2019· article· en· W2975044290 on OpenAlexaff
Badr Mansouri, H. Janati Idrissi, Audrey Venon

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnual Conference of the PHM Society · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsSafran Electronics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKalman filterResidualShort circuitCatastrophic failureRotor (electric)Fault (geology)Fault detection and isolationVoltageComputer scienceSIGNAL (programming language)AvionicsEngineeringElectronic circuitAutomotive engineeringControl theory (sociology)Electrical engineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the next twenty years traffic aircraft will be doubled. Thus, avionic devices will become more and more electric and the aircrafts become lighter in order to save more fuel. Thus, the more electric aircraft will face a great challenge that of the predictive maintenance of its electrical equipments. A key component of these devices is the Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor (PMSM). In this article we are interested in one of the most recurrent failure of electric motor, that of the inter-turn short circuit failure. The purpose of this study, therefore, is to develop an interturn short-circuit sensitive indicator. It’s based on a linear Kalman filter for a healthy model to estimate residual voltage drops in the rotor reference (d,q). The proposed study shows a high sensitive indicator to the inter-turn short-circuit fault even under external disturbances. As well, several features can result from it, especially the signal energy, spectral and statistical information, etc. These features can highlight aging laws that will be used as patterns for Prognosis and Health Management (PHM) of inter-turn short-circuit failure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnual Conference of the PHM SocietySame topicMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207