Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article studies a part of the works of the Wu Ming literary collection. A true cultural, editorial and generational phenomenon in Italy, it is considered emblematic of the network culture and is considered a pioneer of the collision between old and new medias. Thanks to digital technology, we are indeed participating in the multiplication of textualities. Forums, blog, novel, collective forms of writing all are being born in the world of the web, redefining textuality in both its form and its content. This evolution is considered here through a perspective of a more general change in cultural sociability. After historicising these changes. We will commit ourselves to an analysis of its use of digital tools as a means of political and literary expression with the goal of highlighting its intellectual approach. We will show that Wu Ming’s use of the net, expanded to literary work, contributes to the entrenchment of a new culture based on another dialectic between producers and consumers of texts, producing a different view on the works. The web becomes a new channel of exchange, of genre contamination, of meaning transmission, and becomes a free space that establishes a new narrative economy and a redefinition of the scholarly domain. Résumé Dans cet article, nous nous proposons d’étudier une partie de l’oeuvre du collectif littéraire Wu Ming. Véritable phénomène culturel, éditorial et générationnel en Italie, il est considéré comme l’emblème de la culture du réseau et le pionnier de la collision entre anciens et nouveaux médias. Grâce aux technologies informatiques, nous assistons en effet à la multiplication des textualités. Forums, blogs, romans, formes d’écriture collective naissent dans l’espace web, en redéfinissant la textualité dans sa forme et dans son contenu. Cette évolution est ici considérée dans une perspective d’un changement plus général de la sociabilité culturelle. Après avoir historicisé le parcours du collectif, nous nous attacherons à analyser sa pratique de l’outil informatique comme moyen d’expression politique et littéraire dans le but de mettre en exergue sa démarche intellectuelle. Nous montrerons que l’utilisation du Net de la part de Wu Ming, élargie au travail littéraire, contribue à l’enracinement d’une nouvelle culture, basée sur une autre dialectique entre les producteurs et les consommateurs de textes et productrice d’un autre regard sur l’oeuvre. Le web devient un nouveau canal d’échange, de contamination des genres, de transmission de sens, et un libre espace qui détermine une nouvelle économie narrative et une redéfinition de l’espace savant. Mots-clés: Literature contemporaine; Internet; Italie; Luther Blissett Project; Wu Ming; sociabilité culturelle; d’écriture collective
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.015 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".