Cassava Varieties Trichome Density Influence the Infestation of Vatiga illudens (Hemiptera: Tingidae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate the infestation of Vatiga illudens in cassava varieties and to correlate its infestation with the physical and morphological parameters of resistance. The experiments were conducted in the 2014/2015 and 2016/2017 seasons, out in a randomized complete block design with nine treatments and five replicates. Nymphs and adults of V. illudens were evaluated on the abaxial surface of 16 leaves of the middle third of the plant. The density of trichomes was quantified with the use of electron micrographs, and the roughness of the epicuticular wax was assigned to the leaves of the shoot and the apical third. The color components L*, a*, b*, were measured with a portable digital colorimeter. The cultivars IAC 90 and Santa Helena demonstrated the smallest infestations in the 2014/2015 season and maintained low infestation in the 2016/2017 season. The varieties Baianinha, IAC 576-70 and Catarina-Branca, maintained high infestations in the both seasons. The density of trichomes of the middle third of the plants correlated negatively to the V. illudens infestation for the two seasons. The higher density on trichomes, negatively affects the infestation of V. illudens in cassava varieties, characterizing as a specific resistance factor to this species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".