MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2975529195 · doi:10.5937/mckg53-20274

Early defibrillation: A key for successful outcome of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest treatment

2019· article· en· W2975529195 on OpenAlexaff
Niković Vuk, Slađana Vujačić, Vladimir Gajić, Dušan Milenković, Bulajić Ranka, Mersiha Demić

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicinski casopis · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDefibrillationVentricular fibrillationCardiologyInternal medicineCardiopulmonary resuscitationChest painEmergency departmentMyocardial infarctionResuscitationAnesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective. Defibrillation is a part of cardiopulmonary resuscitation that involves delivering electricity through electrodes placed on the chest. Defibrillators generate and then discharge electrical current through two electrodes. The resulting shock simultaneously depolarizes large portions of the atrium or ventricles, interrupting return circuits and recurrent/malignant arrhythmias. Early defibrillation has long been accepted as the standard because ventricular fibrillation (VF) is the most common form of cardiac arrest in outpatient victims and survival is inversely proportional to the time of defibrillation from cardiac arrest. Methods. The case of a 63 years old man with acute myocardial infarction is presented. Outpatient protocol data, medical history, and discharge lists from the Cardiology Clinic were analyzed. Results. A 63 years old male patient comes to the Emergency Room for back pain and dyspnea. On admission he was with stable vital parameters (pressure was 140/90 mmHg, pulse 75 / min., pulse oximetry SaO2 95%) The patient is aware, oriented, dyspnoic, complains of lower back pain and dyspnea. Auscultatory findings on the lungs indicate increased respiratory noise. An ECG was performed in which the sinus rhythm was recorded, with frequencies of 75 / minute with ST depression in D2, D3, AVF, ST segment elevation in AVL, V1-V4. An IV line and vital parameters monitoring were established. ASA 300 mg po was given, and patient then prepared for transport. However just prior transferring patient was bruised in the face, loses consciousness, with convulsions and true opistotonus, and then cardiac arrest occured. CPCR begins. A shock wave VF (ventricular fibrillation) is registered on the defibrillator monitor and decision was made to deliver a DC shock of 360J. The rhythm of cardiac arrest is VF. After one delivered DC shock, the patient begins to breathe, vital parameters normalize, the patient becomes communicative but confused. Sinus rhythm registers on the electrocardiogram again, elevations persist. Patient than was prepared for PCI with medicaments, and with stable vital parameters and monitoring transported to the Emergency Center. After admission, the patient was transferred to a catheterization room where he received a stent on the LAD. Conclusion. Early CPR and defibrillation in first few minutes has the biggest impact in patient recovery/survival in terms of cardiac arrest due to malignant arrhythmias.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicinski casopis→Same topicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation→French-language works237,207→