Cerebral blood flow increases across early childhood
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Adequate cerebral blood flow (CBF) is essential to proper brain development and function. Detailed characterization of CBF developmental trajectories will lead to better understanding of the development of cognitive, motor, and sensory functions, as well as behaviour in children. Previous studies have shown CBF increases during infancy and decreases during adolescence; however, the trajectories during childhood, and in particular the timing of peak CBF, remain unclear. Here, we used arterial spin labeling to map age-related changes of CBF across a large longitudinal sample that included 279 scans on 96 participants (46 girls and 50 boys) aged 2-7 years. CBF maps were analyzed using hierarchical linear regression for every voxel inside the grey matter mask, controlling for multiple comparisons. The results revealed a significant positive linear association between CBF and age in distributed brain regions including prefrontal, temporal, parietal, and occipital cortex, and in the cerebellum. There were no differences in developmental trajectories between males and females. Our findings show that CBF continues to increase until the age of 7 years, likely supporting ongoing improvements in behaviour, cognition, motor, and sensory functions in early childhood.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".