MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2975612455 · doi:10.3390/cells8101146

Tubulin-Dependent Transport of Connexin-36 Potentiates the Size and Strength of Electrical Synapses

2019· article· en· W2975612455 on OpenAlexaff
Cherie A. Brown, Cristiane del Corsso, Christiane Zoidl, Logan W. Donaldson, David C. Spray, Georg Zoidl

Bibliographic record

VenueCells · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicConnexins and lens biology
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
KeywordsConnexinCalmodulinGap junctionNeurotransmissionBiophysicsElectrical SynapsesCell biologyMicrotubuleNMDA receptorProtein subunitChemistryTubulinBiologyNeuroscienceReceptorCalciumBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Connexin-36 (Cx36) electrical synapses strengthen transmission in a calcium/calmodulin (CaM)/calmodulin-dependent kinase II (CaMKII)-dependent manner similar to a mechanism whereby the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor subunit NR2B facilitates chemical transmission. Since NR2B-microtubule interactions recruit receptors to the cell membrane during plasticity, we hypothesized an analogous modality for Cx36. We determined that Cx36 binding to tubulin at the carboxy-terminal domain was distinct from Cx43 and NR2B by binding a motif overlapping with the CaM and CaMKII binding motifs. Dual patch-clamp recordings demonstrated that pharmacological interference of the cytoskeleton and deleting the binding motif at the Cx36 carboxyl-terminal (CT) reversibly abolished Cx36 plasticity. Mechanistic details of trafficking to the gap-junction plaque (GJP) were probed pharmacologically and through mutational analysis, all of which affected GJP size and formation between cell pairs. Lys279, Ile280, and Lys281 positions were particularly critical. This study demonstrates that tubulin-dependent transport of Cx36 potentiates synaptic strength by delivering channels to GJPs, reinforcing the role of protein transport at chemical and electrical synapses to fine-tune communication between neurons.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.259

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCellsSame topicConnexins and lens biologyFrench-language works237,207