Do Rio Grande à terra do fogo: Um estudo sobre a comunidade de estados latino-americanos e caribenhos (CELAC)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present research proposes to carry out an investigation on the Latin American integration process in the present time, focusing on the role and action in the architecture of international organizations of the region. CELAC is a regional international organization founded in the year 2011, composed of 33 countries and designed by diplomacy in Brazil and Mexico. It has a low institutional structure and a broad historical legacy of political concertation, inherited from previous groups and organizations, such as the Group of Rio. Having as one of its objectives the search for autonomy and sovereignty, without the presence of the United States and Canada. The new organization is born in a context of new economic and social political alliances in Latin America, also justified by the need to face the international economic and financial crisis. With the detailed study of its creation and evolution, we seek to understand the main challenges that this new organism faces to fulfill its objectives; From its capacity to respond to the main regional issues, as well as the challenge of living with the traditional leadership in the inter-American space, represented by the Organization of American States (OAS), as well as its capacity to establish itself as a unified forum of representation in International system. To this end, we have appropriated conceptual categories such as "Regionalism" and "Political Concertation" that are relevant to clarify our inquiries in the present investigation, trying to understand if such a process is capable of responding to a new stage of regional integration that surpasses the called "Open Regionalism" of the 1990s.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".