Bearing Condition Monitoring based on the Indicator Generated in Time-frequency Domain
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Most condition monitoring systems rely on system-driven generation of indicators or features for early fault detection. However, this strategy requires the prior knowledge on the system kinematics and/or exact structure parameters of monitored system. To address this problem, this paper presents a novel condition monitoring framework where the condition indicator is generated via data-driven method. In this framework, the time-frequency periodogram is extracted from raw vibration signal first. Then, the acquired time-frequency periodogram is mapped by pseudo Perron vector, which is learned from vibration data, to generate the condition indicator. Finally, the bearing can be monitored via analyzing this indicator using gaussian based control chart. Based on experimental results on a publicly-available database, we show the effectiveness of presented framework for early fault detectionin the continuous operation of rolling bearing, indicating its great potentials in real engineering applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it