MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2976780212 · doi:10.5430/bmr.v8n3p53

Job Dissatisfaction and Turnover Crises in Tunisia

2019· article· en· W2976780212 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hanen Khanchel, Karim Ben Kahla

Bibliographic record

VenueBusiness and Management Research · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCustomer Service Quality and Loyalty
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLikert scaleScale (ratio)Job satisfactionPsychologyTest (biology)Turnover intentionRegression analysisSocial psychologyJob dissatisfactionQuality (philosophy)Multilevel modelStructural equation modelingApplied psychologyStatisticsMathematicsDevelopmental psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this paper is to develop a scale to measure employee satisfaction and test the nature of the relationship between job dissatisfaction and turnover; and to test if some sociodemographic variables can moderate this relation same as above. Data was collected from Tunisian Information and Communications Technology Sector (ICT). As quantitative methodology employs numerical data to quantify the social phenomenon, choosing the right techniques enable social scientists to analyse the findings of the study accurately using both structural equation analysis and hierarchical regression. The results indicated that the level of employee dissatisfaction influences their turnover intention. The results confirm that job dissatisfaction has an even greater impact on departure intentions as the level of satisfaction is low. A Likert scale is developped in this study, often found on survey forms, that measures how people feel about Quality of Working life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.189
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBusiness and Management ResearchSame topicCustomer Service Quality and LoyaltyFrench-language works237,207