Bibliographic record
Abstract
We apply a certain unifying physical description of the results of Information Theory. Assuming that heat entropy is a thermodynamic realization of information entropy, we construct a cyclical, thermodynamic, average-value model of an information transfer chain as a general heat engine, in particular a Carnot engine, reversible or irreversible. A working medium of the cycle (a thermodynamic system transforming input heat energy) can be considered as a thermodynamic, average-value model or, as such, as a realization of an information transfer channel. We show that for a model realized in this way the extended II. Principle of Thermodynamics is valid and we formulate its information form.In addition we solve the problem of a proof of II. Principle of Thermodynamics. We state the relation between the term of information entropy, introduced by C. Shannon (1948), and thermodynamic entropy, introduced by R. Clausius (1850) and, further, explain the Gibbs paradox. Our way to deal with the given topic is a connection of both the mathematical definitions of information entropies and their mutual relations within a system of stochastic quantities, especially with thermodynamic entropies defined on an isolated system in which a realization of our (repeatable) observation is performed [it is a (cyclic) transformation of heat energy of an observed, measured system].We use the information description to analyze the Gibbs paradox, reasoning it as a property of such observation, measuring an (equilibrium) thermodynamic system. We state a logical proof of the II. P.T. as a derivation of relations among the entropies of a system of stochastic variables, realized physically, and, the Equivalence Principle of the I., II. and III. Principle of Thermodynamics is formulated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".