MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2977266224 · doi:10.1038/s41562-019-0738-8

Identification of neurobehavioural symptom groups based on shared brain mechanisms

2019· article· en· W2977266224 on OpenAlexaff
Alex Ing, Philipp G. Sämann, Congying Chu, Nicole Tay, Francesca Biondo, Guillaume Robert, Tianye Jia, Thomas Wolfers, Sylvane Desrivières, Tobias Banaschewski, Arun L.W. Bokde, Uli Bromberg, Christian Büchel, Patricia Conrod, Tahmine Fadai, Herta Flor, Vincent Frouin, Hugh Garavan, Philip A. Spechler, Penny Gowland, Yvonne Grimmer, Andreas Heinz, Bernd Ittermann, Viola Kappel, Jean‐Luc Martinot, Andreas Meyer‐Lindenberg, Sabina Millenet, Frauke Nees, Betteke Maria van Noort, Dimitri Papadopoulos Orfanos, Marie‐Laure Paillère Martinot, Jani Penttilä, Luise Poustka, Erin Burke Quinlan, Michael N. Smolka, Argyris Stringaris, Maren Struve, Ilya M. Veer, Henrik Walter, Robert Whelan, Ole A. Andreassen, Ingrid Agartz, Hervé Lemaître, Edward D. Barker, John Ashburner, Elisabeth B. Binder, Jan K. Buitelaar, André F. Marquand, Trevor W. Robbins

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Human Behaviour · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
FundersMedical Research CouncilFondation pour la Recherche MédicaleEU Joint Programme – Neurodegenerative Disease ResearchInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche MédicaleAgence Nationale de la RechercheMission Interministérielle de Lutte Contre les Drogues et les Conduites AddictivesScience Foundation IrelandEuropean CommissionDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftKing's College LondonFondation de FranceBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchNational Institutes of HealthNIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust/Institute of Cancer ResearchSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
KeywordsNeuroimagingPsychopathologyAnxietyPsychologyDepression (economics)Clinical psychologyModalitiesBrain Structure and FunctionFunctional neuroimagingPsychiatryPsychological intervention

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations56
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueNature Human BehaviourSame topicFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesFrench-language works237,207