Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a technique for generating an amplitude tapered incident plane wave of a prescribed polarization and a prescribed incidence angle by summing a finite number of propagating uniform plane waves each constitutive plane wave having is own propagation direction, its own amplitude and it own polarization. The choice of the propagating plane waves corresponds here to a sampling of the physical angular space (θ,φ). This contrasts with the 2-D Fourier transform technique of Reference [1] that corresponds to a sampling of the spectral plane (κ x , κ y ) where κ x = sin(θ) cos(φ) and κ y = sin(θ) sin(φ). Our technique is based on the summation of propagating plane waves only whereas the technique of Reference [1] is based on the summation of both propagating and evanescent plane waves. Evanescent plane waves are plane waves with Imag(κ z ) ≠ 0 and correspond to points of the (κ x , κ y ) plane lying outside the unit circle of the spectral plane. The dominant plane wave is the plane wave with its propagation direct corresponding to the prescribed incidence angle described by the spherical angles θi and φi. Both techniques are vector forms of the scalar theorem of plane wave spectrum decomposition. The motivation for producing a tapered beam here is to avoid the diffraction waves caused by illuminating also the edges of a scatterer of which we want to compute by FDTD simulation the reflection and he transmission coefficients corresponding to the bulk material property of the scatterer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".