Cache-Oblivious Priority Queues with Decrease-Key and Applications to Graph Algorithms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present priority queues in the cache-oblivious external memory model with block size $B$ and main memory size $M$ that support on $N$ elements, operation \textsc{UPDATE} (combination of \textsc{INSERT} and \textsc{DECREASEKEY}) in $O \left(\frac{1}{B}\log_{\frac{\lambda}{B}} \frac{N}{B}\right)$ amortized I/Os and operations \textsc{EXTRACT-MIN} and \textsc{DELETE} in $O \left(\lceil \frac{\lambda^{\varepsilon}}{B} \log_{\frac{\lambda}{B}} \frac{N}{B} \rceil \log_{\frac{\lambda}{B}} \frac{N}{B}\right)$ amortized I/Os, using $O \left(\frac{N}{B}\log_{\frac{\lambda}{B}} \frac{N}{B}\right)$ blocks, for a user-defined parameter $\lambda \in [2, N ]$ and any real $\varepsilon \in (0,1)$. Our result improves upon previous I/O-efficient cache-oblivious and cache-aware priority queues [Chowdhury and Ramachandran, TALG 2018], [Brodal et al., SWAT 2004], [Kumar and Schwabe, SPDP 1996], [Arge et al., SICOMP 2007], [Fadel et al., TCS 1999]. We also present buffered repository trees that support on a multi-set of $N$ elements, operation \textsc{INSERT} in $O \left(\frac{1}{B}\log_{\frac{\lambda}{B}} \frac{N}{B}\right)$ I/Os and operation \textsc{EXTRACT} on $K$ extracted elements in $O \left(\frac{\lambda^{\varepsilon}}{B} \log_{\frac{\lambda}{B}} \frac{N}{B} + \frac{K}{B}\right)$ amortized I/Os, using $O \left(\frac{N}{B}\right)$ blocks, improving previous cache-aware and cache-oblivious results [Arge et al., SICOMP '07], [Buchsbaum et al., SODA '00]. In the cache-oblivious model, for $\lambda = O \left(E/V\right)$, we achieve $O \left(\frac{E}{B}\log_{\frac{E}{V B}} \frac{E}{B}\right)$ I/Os for single-source shortest paths, depth-first search and breadth-first search algorithms on massive directed dense graphs $(V,E)$. Our algorithms are I/O-optimal for $E/V = \Omega (M)$ (and in the cache-aware setting for $\lambda = O(M)$).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".