MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2977481199

Scaling a convolutional neural network based Flower counting application in a distributed GPU cluster

2019· dissertation· en· W2977481199 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mohammed Rashid Chowdhury

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2019
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSmart Agriculture and AI
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvolutional neural networkComputer scienceScalingCluster (spacecraft)Parallel computingGPU clusterArtificial intelligenceComputational scienceCUDAMathematicsOperating system
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Taking advantage of modern data acquisition techniques, the researchers of P2IRC located at the University of Saskatchewan developed an application to monitor the status of the flower growth during different phases of the blooming period and the yield prediction of canola crops. Though the application could predict the near accurate number of flowers in a few scenarios, its inability to function under challenging situations such as misinterpreting sun reflection or dust along the roadside as flowers have motivated the researchers to find an alternative approach of counting flowers. In addition to being a more accurate version, another goal is for the new application to be faster to infer the number of flowers and scalable in distributed environments. \n\nPutting these goals in mind, in this thesis, a Convolutional neural network (CNN) based flower counting application is developed and evaluated taking inspiration from two other previous works where CNN was used for counting heads in dense crowds and predicting the number of bacterial cells from medical imagery. In addition to that, the application addresses the performance and the accuracy goals previously mentioned. Two challenges of using the neural network are (a) the training needs a large volume of data to converge to a low error and (b) the training is computationally expensive and it takes longer time to complete. \n\nTo address the first challenge, experiments were run with both "ground truth" estimated using a modified version of the previous flower counter, and ground truth from manual annotation. To address the problem of long training time, two distributed versions of the proposed application were created based on two different distributed architectures called Parameter Server and Ring-AllReduce. Moreover, a detailed explanation of the proposed CNN's architecture along with its memory footprints and GPU utilization is also organized as an in-depth case study to help trace the model's memory consumption during training.\n\nFrom different sets of experiments, the new flower counter application is observed more accurate than its previous version and both implementations of its distributed versions successfully reduced the total completion time as a result of being linearly scalable when more workers are added to run the training. The Ring-AllReduce version performed slightly better than the Parameter Server, but the differences were not substantial.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.172
Threshold uncertainty score0.931

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.150
Teacher spread0.145 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan)Same topicSmart Agriculture and AIFrench-language works237,207