MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Outpatient Placement of Feeding Gastrostomy (PEG) Prior to Chemo-Radiation for Head & Neck Cancer

2005· article· en· W2977482617 on OpenAlexaff
Elaine Posluns, Ian Poon, Lawrence B. Cohen

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicClinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePEG ratioGastrostomyHead and neck cancerHead and neckCancerGastrostomy tubeSurgeryRadiation therapyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: Patients with Head & Neck cancer (HNCa) undergoing chemoradiotherapy and/or surgery are at high risk for severe weight loss, dehydration, malnutrition, treatment interruptions and hospitalization. The use of PEG in this population offers a safe, effective method of delivering enteral nutrition to compensate for the decline in oral intake. In the past, patients were admitted to hospital for PEG insertion and education when effects of the cancer treatment caused significant dysphagia, mucositis and reduced oral intake. We are reporting initial results of an innovative program for HNCa patients during which out patient PEG is established prior to the start of chemo-radiation. Follow up and education regarding the care and use of the tube are provided on an outpatient basis. Methods: HNCa patients were selected to have a PEG established prior to chemo-radiation based on individual MD practice. All patients received nutrition counselling and education by a registered dietitian prior to treatment. Weight loss, treatment interruptions and hospitalizations were compared in patients who had vs didn't have a pre-treatment PEG. Results: 31 patients received PEG and enteral feeding as an outpatient procedure and were compared to a group of 20 similar patients who did not receive a PEG. In the PEG group, average weight loss following treatment was 6.8% compared to 11.0% in the non PEG group. 100% of the PEG group completed treatment without interruption or hospitalization for malnutrition/dehydration, compared to 29% of the non-PEG patients who required iv-hydration or hospital admission for nutrition support. PEG complications were abdominal pain requiring hospitalization (2), infection (5). Conclusions: Patients with PEG received more of their prescribed nutrition and fluids, lost less weight, and had fewer treatment interruptions and hospital admissions than non-PEG patients. An average 3–5 day hospital admission for in-patient PEG placement is eliminated saving health care costs. PEG insertion in ambulatory HNCa patients prio to chemo-radiation is safe, well tolerated, cost effective and improves clinical outcome. Our experience supports PEG tube insertion in ambulatory HnCa patients prior to treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology→Same topicClinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology→French-language works237,207→