MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Cardiorespiratory Stress-Response in Youth with Persistent Post-Concussion Symptoms

2019· article· en· W2977496340 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Aliyah Snyder, Meghan Patel, Christopher Sheridan, Alexandra Tanner, Douglas R. Polster, Talin Babikian, Michelle Craske, Meeryo Choe, Christopher C. Giza, Robert Asarnow

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of Canada
KeywordsCardiorespiratory fitnessNeuropsychologyCognitionArousalStressorConcussionMedicinePsychologyAudiologyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationPhysical therapyClinical psychologyPoison controlPsychiatryInjury preventionNeuroscienceMedical emergency

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective To evaluate cardiorespiratory response to a cognitive/emotional stressor in youth with persistent post-concussion symptoms (PPCS). Background The mechanisms of PPCS (symptoms lasting > 2 months) are poorly understood, but recent studies have emphasized the interactive effect of biopsychosocial factors during recovery. In particular, emerging evidence points to anomalies in autonomic functioning as a key player in PPCS. Autonomic functioning is best measured under conditions of stress; however, there are no current studies that examine autonomic functioning in response to cognitive/emotional stressors in youth with PPCS. Therefore, the present study sought to examine the autonomic response to a cognitive/emotional stressor as measured by a cardiorespiratory outcome (end-tidal CO2 fraction [ETCO2]) as well as cognitive performance metrics in youth with PPCS. Design/Methods Participants included 7 patients diagnosed with concussion and 7 non-injured controls between the ages of 13–25. Participants were administered a modified version of the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT), a neuropsychological task that is known to induce autonomic arousal. ETCO2 data were collected via continuous capnometry recording throughout the task and for 10 minutes after. Results After the PASAT, PPCS patients’ ETCO2 concentration remained stable over the 10’ post-stress period compared to controls who demonstrated a significant increase in ETCO2 (p < 0.05) after the cognitive/emotional stressor. In general, patients with PPCS performed more poorly on the middle trials of the PASAT compared to controls but comparisons were not significant. Conclusions PPCS patients demonstrate abnormal cardiorespiratory functioning following a cognitive/emotional stressor in that their ETCO2 concentrations remain chronically low after stress. Results suggest autonomic dysregulation is a promising avenue for future research into the etiology of PPCS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurology→Same topicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation→French-language works237,207→