MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2977556245 · doi:10.1080/15384101.2019.1673100

Dysfunctional CAF-I reveals its role in cell cycle progression and differential regulation of gene silencing

2019· article· en· W2977556245 on OpenAlexafffund
Hollie Rowlands, Kholoud Shaban, Ashley Cheng, Barret Foster, Krassimir Yankulov

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Cycle · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA Repair Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBiologyChromatinCyclin-dependent kinaseGene silencingCell cycleCell biologyHistoneKinaseGeneticsGeneMolecular biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chromatin Assembly Factor I (CAF-I) plays a central role in the reassembly of H3/H4 histones during DNA replication. In S. cerevisiae CAF-I is not essential and its loss is associated with reduced gene silencing at telomeres and increased sensitivity to DNA damage. Two kinases, Cyclin Dependent Kinase (CDK) and Dbf4-Dependent Kinase (DDK), are known to phosphorylate the Cac1p subunit of CAF-I, but their role in the regulation of CAF-I activity is not well understood. In this study we systematically mutated the phosphorylation target sites of these kinases. We show that concomitant mutations of the CDK and DDK target sites of Cac1p lead to growth retardation and significant cell cycle defects, altered cell morphology and increased sensitivity to DNA damage. Surprisingly, some mutations also produced flocculation, a phenotype that is lost in most laboratory strains, and displayed elevated expression of FLO genes. None of these effects is observed upon the destruction of CAF-I. In contrast, the mutations that caused flocculation did not affect gene silencing at the mating type and subtelomeric loci.We conclude that dysfunctional CAF-I produces severe phenotypes, which reveal a possible role of CAF-I in the coordination of DNA replication, chromatin reassembly and cell cycle progression. Our study highlights the role of phosphorylation of Cac1p by CDK and a putative role for DDK in the transmission and re-assembly of chromatin during DNA replication.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.409

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCell CycleSame topicDNA Repair MechanismsFrench-language works237,207