Une langue « tordue » ? Réappropriations identitaires par les récits de vie : pratiques translangagières et agentivité en contexte migratoire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La question des rapports de force entre langues en période de mutation géopolitique est particulièrement saillante lorsque l’individu en situation de migration est amené à se raconter. Nous proposons une analyse à la fois sociolinguistique et postcoloniale d’entretiens, menés aux Pays-Bas, entre des nouveaux arrivants francophones et une interlocutrice néerlandaise, qui met à jour un rôle inédit des répertoires plurilingues et stratégies translangagières dans la médiation des identités par le biais du français. Nous croisons les points de vue historiques et contemporains, pour comprendre comment l’espace translangagier qui se crée dans ce contexte permet la rencontre, la modification des rapports de domination, et la réhabilitation identitaire. Plus généralement, nous interrogeons le rôle de la langue cible comme moyen privilégié d’accession à l’insertion sociale. Nous plaidons pour une reconnaissance et une prise en compte par les institutions des biographies langagières.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".