The Alpha-Mendeleev ridge, a large igneous province with continental affinities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Alpha Ridge-Mendeleev Rise (AMR) is the major bathymetric feature in the Amerasia Basin of the Arctic Ocean. Its tectonic history is controversial due to its remote location in ice covered waters making data acquisition difficult, resulting in the lack of diagnostic data. Analysis of the wide-angle reflection/refraction data based on the compressional waves (P-waves) from the AMR indicates that its velocity/depth structure is typical of large igneous provinces (LIPs). LIPs can form on either oceanic or continental crust and can exhibit complex history of development. Here converted shear waves (S-wave) on the Alpha Ridge have been used to calculate Poisson’s ratios and many of measured values are within the felsic range in the upper crust. They are comparable to published S-waves from the Mendeleev Rise. They are also consistent with the results of Rayleigh-wave group-velocity analysis that indicate the Alpha Ridge in adjacent northern Canada has an intermediate composition. Based on magnetics, pseudogravity and volumetric considerations the High Arctic Large Igneous Province (HALIP) most closely resembles the Kerguelen Plateau, a LIP with a continental component. The geophysical characteristics of the AMR are compatible with a number of other LIPs that have continental affinities. A variety of offshore information from dredges and cores and onshore geological data support continental fragments incorporated in the AMR.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".