MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Use of Serial Balloon-Assisted Enteroscopies in the Monitoring and Management of Patients With Small Bowel Crohnʼs Disease

2015· article· en· W2978041815 on OpenAlexaff
Matt Reeson, Brendan P. Halloran, Richard N. Fedorak, Sergio Zepeda-Gómez, Christopher Teshima

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBalloon dilationEndoscopyAnastomosisDemographicsCapsule endoscopyInflammatory bowel diseaseRetrospective cohort studyCrohn's diseaseEnteroscopyBalloonDouble-balloon enteroscopySurgeryDiseaseInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Balloon Assisted Enteroscopy (BAE) consists of two endoscopic procedures: Double Balloon Endoscopy (DBE) and Single Balloon Endoscopy (SBE). BAE provides the ability to both visualize the small bowel mucosa and to provide therapeutic interventions. By using BAE serially, physicians are able to monitor disease progression and response to therapy, as well as treat obstructive symptoms. This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of serial BAE in the maintenance and monitoring of small bowel CD patients. Methods: A retrospective chart review was undertaken to examine all patients with small bowel CD who had more than one BAE. Data collection included patient demographics (age at BAE, duration of disease), indications for BAE (obstructive symptoms, disease activity assessment, query CD), operational outcomes (medication escalation, recommendation of surgery, further imaging, or additional BAE), stricture dilation data (anastomotic vs. native, dilation diameter, number of successful/failed dilations), and medication information (biologics, immunosuppressives, corticosteroids, 5-ASAs). Results: 37 BAEs (7 SBE, 30 DBE) were carried out on 15 patients (10 male), a mean of 2.4 procedures/patient (range: 2-5). The mean age at BAE was 42.1y with average disease duration of 15 years. 16 patients (43%) were seen for disease assessment, 16 (43%) for obstructive symptoms, and 5 (14%) for suspected CD. Outcomes included medication escalation or maintenance and recommendations towards surgical resection, further alternative imaging, or follow-up BAE. 1 (6.7%) patient underwent a surgical resection between BAEs. 10 patients (66%) underwent 19 (51%) BAEs for stricture dilations, in which 41 strictures were dilated; 26 primary and 16 anastomotic. The average diameter of dilation was 16 mm. 7 strictures (17%) were considered non-traversable by the endoscope. The complication rate was 2.7% (1 patient experienced pancreatitis). No other complications were noted. Conclusion: BAE is an effective and safe modality for maintenance and monitoring of small bowel CD. Both DBE and SBE provide the ability to visualize the small bowel with minimal risk of perforation or complication. Both procedures are effective for diagnosis of small bowel CD as well as therapeutic intervention, in particular, stricture dilation. Serial BAE allows for enhanced management and decisionmaking in the care of small bowel CD patients.Table 1: Procedural data for patients with known or query Crohn's undergoing serial balloon assisted enteroscopyTable 2: Post-procedural outcome data for patients with known or query Crohn's undergoing serial balloon assisted enteroscopy

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of GastroenterologySame topicGastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207