Tofacitinib Has Induction Efficacy in Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis, Regardless of Prior TNF Inhibitor Therapy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Tofacitinib is an oral, small molecule JAK inhibitor that is being investigated for ulcerative colitis (UC). Two Phase 3 randomized placebo (PBO)-controlled studies (OCTAVE Induction 1 and 2: NCT01465763, NCT01458951) demonstrated efficacy of tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily (BID) vs PBO as induction therapy for patients (pts) with moderate to severe UC.1 Here, we assessed the effect of TNF inhibitor (TNFi) therapy and disease severity on clinical efficacy and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Methods: Adults with moderately to severely active UC (Mayo score ≥6, rectal bleeding subscore ≥1 and endoscopic subscore ≥2) and prior failure/intolerance to ≥1 of corticosteroids, thiopurines or TNFi were randomized (4:1) to receive tofacitinib 10 mg or PBO BID for up to 9 weeks (wks). Efficacy endpoints at Wk 8 included: remission (Mayo score ≤2, no subscore >1 and rectal bleeding subscore of 0), mucosal healing at Wk 8 (Mayo endoscopic subscore ≤1), clinical response (decrease from baseline Mayo score of ≥3 points and ≥30%, plus decrease in rectal bleeding subscore ≥1 or absolute subscore ≤1). PROs at Wk 8 included IBDQ remission (total score ≥170) and IBDQ response (≥16-point increase from baseline). For binary endpoints, comparison of tofacitinib vs PBO was assessed using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) chi-square test stratified by study, prior TNFi therapy, baseline corticosteroid use and geographic region. Within each subgroup, the CMH chi-square test stratified by study was used.Table 1: Summary of efficacy endpoints in OCTAVE Induction 1 and OCTAVE Induction 2 at Wk 8Results: Significantly more pts achieved remission, mucosal healing and clinical response at Wk 8 with tofacitinib 10 mg BID vs PBO (all p < 0.0001).The difference generally remained significant regardless of prior TNFi exposure, prior TNFi failure, primary or secondary TNFi failure or baseline Mayo score (≥9 or < 9). For all three endpoints, greater effects were observed when comparing secondary vs primary TNFi failure and baseline Mayo score < 9 vs ≥9 subpopulations. IBDQ remission and response were significantly greater with tofacitinib 10 mg BID vs PBO at Wk 8 regardless of prior TNFi exposure/prior TNFi failure. Conclusion: Tofacitinib 10 mg BID demonstrated efficacy vs PBO, regardless of prior TNFi therapy or baseline disease severity, in pts with moderately and severely active UC. PRO results were similar in pts with/without prior TNFi exposure or failure. Funded by Pfizer Inc. 1. Sandborn WJ et al. J Crohns Colitis 2016;10(S1):S15.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".