Sustained Virologic Response Rate of 96% in HCV Genotype 1a-Infected Patients Treated With Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/r and Dasabuvir With Ribavirin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: The interferon-free 3 direct-acting antiviral (3D) regimen of ombitasvir (an NS5A inhibitor), paritaprevir (an HCV NS3/4A protease inhibitor identified by AbbVie and Enanta, boosted with ritonavir [r]) and dasabuvir (a non-nucleoside NS5B RNA polymerase inhibitor) is approved to treat patients infected with HCV genotype (GT) 1. Using pooled data from four phase 3 studies in treatmentnaïve and prior pegIFN/RBV-experienced patients with GT1a infection, with or without cirrhosis, we report the safety and efficacy in patients who received the label-recommended 3D regimen plus ribavirin (RBV). Methods: Genotype 1a-infected patients from the PEARL-IV, SAPPHIRE-I, SAPPHIRE-II, and TUR-QUOISE-II studies were included in this post-hoc analysis. Efficacy was assessed by the proportion of patients achieving sustained virologic response (HCV RNA < 25 IU/mL) 12 weeks after completion of treatment (SVR12). Per the US Prescribing Information and European SmPC, the label-recommended regimen for GT1a infection is 3D+RBV for 12 weeks in non-cirrhotic patients, and 3D+RBV for 24 weeks in patients with cirrhosis. Adverse events (AEs) and laboratory measures are reported for all patients receiving the label-recommended regimen. Results: Among 714 HCV GT1a-infected patients treated with the label-recommended 3D+RBV regimen, 64% were male, 33% were treatment-experienced, 17% had cirrhosis, and 85% had baseline viral loads ≥800,000 IU/mL. Sustained virologic response was achieved in 96% (95% CI, 94-97%) of patients (Table). Response rates were similar regardless of the presence or absence of cirrhosis (95 versus 96%, respectively). Virologic failure was observed in 18 (2.5%) patients, 5 (0.7%) with on-treatment breakthrough and 13 (1.8%) with post-treatment relapse. Seven patients (1.0%) discontinued treatment due to AEs, 4 of whom subsequently achieved SVR12. The most common AEs were fatigue (41%), headache (33%), nausea (23%), and insomnia (17%). Grade 3+ laboratory abnormalities were infrequent for ALT (0.9%), AST (0.6%), hemoglobin (0.3%), and total bilirubin (2.8%). Conclusion: In HCV GT1a-infected patients, the label-recommended 3D regimen with RBV achieved high SVR12 rates, including historically difficult-to-cure subgroups of patients with prior PR null response and/or cirrhosis.Table 1
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".