MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Sustained Virologic Response Rate of 96% in HCV Genotype 1a-Infected Patients Treated With Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/r and Dasabuvir With Ribavirin

2015· article· en· W2978192493 on OpenAlexaff
Vinod K. Rustgi, Heiner Wedemeyer, Paul J. Pockros, Samuel Lee, Edward Gane, Christophe Moreno, Simone I. Strasser, Victor de Lédinghen, A Maieron, Wangang Xie, Roger Trinh, Yan Luo, Fernando Tatsch

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHepatitis C virus research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOmbitasvirMedicineParitaprevirRitonavirRibavirinRegimenDasabuvirLedipasvirInternal medicineGastroenterologyHepatitis CVirologyHepatitis C virusViral loadVirus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: The interferon-free 3 direct-acting antiviral (3D) regimen of ombitasvir (an NS5A inhibitor), paritaprevir (an HCV NS3/4A protease inhibitor identified by AbbVie and Enanta, boosted with ritonavir [r]) and dasabuvir (a non-nucleoside NS5B RNA polymerase inhibitor) is approved to treat patients infected with HCV genotype (GT) 1. Using pooled data from four phase 3 studies in treatmentnaïve and prior pegIFN/RBV-experienced patients with GT1a infection, with or without cirrhosis, we report the safety and efficacy in patients who received the label-recommended 3D regimen plus ribavirin (RBV). Methods: Genotype 1a-infected patients from the PEARL-IV, SAPPHIRE-I, SAPPHIRE-II, and TUR-QUOISE-II studies were included in this post-hoc analysis. Efficacy was assessed by the proportion of patients achieving sustained virologic response (HCV RNA < 25 IU/mL) 12 weeks after completion of treatment (SVR12). Per the US Prescribing Information and European SmPC, the label-recommended regimen for GT1a infection is 3D+RBV for 12 weeks in non-cirrhotic patients, and 3D+RBV for 24 weeks in patients with cirrhosis. Adverse events (AEs) and laboratory measures are reported for all patients receiving the label-recommended regimen. Results: Among 714 HCV GT1a-infected patients treated with the label-recommended 3D+RBV regimen, 64% were male, 33% were treatment-experienced, 17% had cirrhosis, and 85% had baseline viral loads ≥800,000 IU/mL. Sustained virologic response was achieved in 96% (95% CI, 94-97%) of patients (Table). Response rates were similar regardless of the presence or absence of cirrhosis (95 versus 96%, respectively). Virologic failure was observed in 18 (2.5%) patients, 5 (0.7%) with on-treatment breakthrough and 13 (1.8%) with post-treatment relapse. Seven patients (1.0%) discontinued treatment due to AEs, 4 of whom subsequently achieved SVR12. The most common AEs were fatigue (41%), headache (33%), nausea (23%), and insomnia (17%). Grade 3+ laboratory abnormalities were infrequent for ALT (0.9%), AST (0.6%), hemoglobin (0.3%), and total bilirubin (2.8%). Conclusion: In HCV GT1a-infected patients, the label-recommended 3D regimen with RBV achieved high SVR12 rates, including historically difficult-to-cure subgroups of patients with prior PR null response and/or cirrhosis.Table 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology→Same topicHepatitis C virus research→French-language works237,207→