MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Duodenal Varices

2005· article· en· W2978204069 on OpenAlexaff
Jin Kee Ho, Nasim Mahmoudi, Jaber Al Ali, Eric M. Yoshida, Michael F. Byrne

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Disease and Transplantation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePortal hypertensionPortal vein thrombosisVaricesEsophageal varicesVarixPortal venous pressureGastric varicesCirrhosisEndoscopyInternal medicineGastroenterologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Duodenal varices are a rare but potentially serious consequence of portal hypertension in the event of a bleed. We report two patients with duodenal varices secondary to portal hypertension The first is a 19-year-old female with significant portal hypertension with cavernous transformation of the portal vein secondary to portal vein thrombosis acquired as a child following umbilical vein cannulation. Multiple esophageal varices, a small fundal varix and a solitary post-bulbar duodenal varix approximately 2cm in diameter were noted at endoscopy. The esophageal varices were successfully obliterated by band ligation after a total of seven sessions and she is on a beta-blocker. The size of duodenal varix was unchanged at follow up endoscopies. Abdominal CT also demonstrated several large intraabdominal varices (mesenteric and splanchnic) not visible at endoscopy. The second patient was a 56-year-old gentleman with severe coronary artery disease and decompensated liver disease with portal and splenic vein thrombosis. He presented with an episode of severe upper gastrointestinal bleeding and was found at endoscopy to have large duodenal varices. He underwent a mesocaval shunt that successfully controlled the bleeding but he died several days post-operatively due to a cardiac event. Two-thirds of all reported cases of duodenal varices have portal venous hypertension caused by hepatic cirrhosis. In the remaining one-third, prehepatic portal hypertension as a consequence of either a compromised portal venous circulation (portal vein thrombosis) or a primary hematological disease is the underlying cause. There is currently no consensus with regards to management and very little evidence on which to base clinical decision-making. Isolated case reports have reported treatment of active hemorrhage with variceal obliteration (i.e. injection of sclerosant or band ligation) whereas others have reported treatment with decompressive shunting. We note that there is no reported literature on prophylaxis of patients who have yet to have a first bleed. A review of the literature and possible management strategies will be discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.066

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology→Same topicLiver Disease and Transplantation→French-language works237,207→