MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Seronegative Status Is Associated with Less Severe Disease Phenotype in Newly Diagnosed Crohnʼs Disease in the Community

2016· article· en· W2978251970 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Eric J. Mao, Samir A. Shah, Meaghan Mallette, Jason T. Machan, Jason M. Shapiro, Renee Bright, Heather Moniz, Marjorie Merrick, Bruce E. Sands

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInterquartile rangeInternal medicineInflammatory bowel diseaseProspective cohort studyGastroenterologyCrohn's diseaseCohortDiseaseCohort studySeverity of illness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: The prognostic value of seromarkers in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been studied in tertiary referral center populations. We investigated the relationship between seromarker positivity and disease course in newly-diagnosed Crohn's disease (CD) in a community-based cohort. Methods: The Ocean State Crohn's and Colitis Area Registry is a prospective, community-based cohort of patients with newly-diagnosed IBD enrolled from 2008 to 2013. Clinical diagnosis was confirmed by NIDDK IBD Genetics Consortium criteria. Serum was banked at enrollment for subsequent testing. Patients were followed prospectively for a median (interquartile range) of 60.1 (35.7) months for hospitalizations, surgeries, and therapy initiation. Seropositive CD was defined as a clinical diagnosis of CD with two or more positive seromarkers. Seronegative CD was defined as a clinical diagnosis of CD with one or less positive seromarkers. CRP positivity and disease behavior per Montreal Classifications were compared between seropositive and seronegative patients. Time to first hospitalization, surgery, steroid, immunomodulator, or biologic was compared between seropositive and seronegative patients using the Wilcoxon test. Results: Of the 225 newly-diagnosed CD patients, 126 were seropositive and 99 were seronegative. Seronegative patients had lower rates of elevated CRPs than seropositive patients (28.3% vs 61.1%, p < 0.0001). Seronegative patients demonstrated lower rates of stricturing and penetrating disease and higher rates of inflammatory disease behavior when compared with seropositive patients (8.1%, 7.1%, 84.9% vs. 19.8%, 15.1%, 65.1%, p = 0.004). Seronegative patients possessed lower rates of perianal disease compared with seropositive patients (4.0% vs. 11.1%, p = 0.05) (Table 1). At 6, 12, and 24 month follow-up, fewer seronegative patients than seropositive patients experienced disease progression in the form of steroid, immunomodulator, or biologic initiation, hospitalization, or intra-abdominal surgery (Table 2). There was no difference between seronegative and seropositive patients in time to first disease progression event (p= 0.11).Table 1: Baseline Disease Phenotype at Diagnosis in Seronegative and Seropositive Newly Diagnosed Community Crohn's Disease PatientsTable 2: Progression of Disease at 6, 12 and 24 Months in Seronegative and Seropositive Newly-diagnosed Community Crohn's Disease PatientsConclusion: Seropositive CD is associated with higher rates of elevated CRP and more severe disease phenotype. Although we did not detect differences in time to hospitalization, surgery or treatment with advanced therapies, duration of follow-up was limited. Seronegative CD in community-based patients may have a favorable prognosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→