MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2978282341 · doi:10.55411/26652544.90

Pico Centrales Hidroeléctricas (pCH): una alternativa energética en zonas no interconectadas de Colombia

2018· article· es· W2978282341 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLetras ConCiencia TecnoLógica · 2018
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEnergy
TopicEnvironmental and Ecological Studies
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesGeographyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En el presente trabajo se describe el procedimiento adelantado, hasta la fecha, por el Grupo interdisciplinar de Estudios Ambientales (GEA), en el desarrollo del proyecto de investigación “Estudio de factibilidad para la implementación de una Pico Central Hidroeléctrica (ρCH) de 1000 w en zonas llanas no interconectadas de Colombia”, el cual está orientado a formular una posible solución a la falta de energía disponible en la zonas de la Orinoquía y la Amazonía colombianas. Se inicia con una breve descripción de la problemática, posteriormente se analiza el recurso hídrico y las condiciones demográficas de la región objeto de estudio; a continuación, se describen algunas características de la denominada generación distribuida (GD), y en ella, las pico centrales hidroeléctricas, que podrían implementarse, considerada como opción válida para la solución del problema; finalmente, la metodología propuesta para adelantar el estudio del impacto ambiental que una obra de estas características genera.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.498
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it