MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2978302004 · doi:10.4171/jems/1121

The Ramsey property for Banach spaces and Choquet simplices

2021· preprint· en· W2978302004 on OpenAlexafffund
Dana Bartošová, J. López-Abad, Martino Lupini, Brice Mbombo

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the European Mathematical Society · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Topology and Set Theory
Canadian institutionsCollège Lionel Groulx
FundersBanff International Research Station for Mathematical Innovation and DiscoveryFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloInstituto de Ciencias MatemáticasAgence Nationale de la RechercheNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMathematicsPointwiseBanach spaceSimplexUnit sphereSeparable spaceCombinatoricsGroup (periodic table)Automorphism groupDiscrete mathematicsAdditive functionPure mathematicsAutomorphismMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We show that the Gurarij space \mathbb{G} has extremely amenable automorphism group. This answers a question of Melleray and Tsankov. We also compute the universal minimal flow of the automorphism group of the Poulsen simplex \mathbb{P} and we prove that it consists of the canonical action on \mathbb{P} itself. This answers a question of Conley and Törnquist. We show that the pointwise stabilizer of any closed proper face of \mathbb{P} is extremely amenable. Similarly, the pointwise stabilizer of any closed proper biface of the unit ball of the dual of the Gurarij space (the Lusky simplex) is extremely amenable. These results are obtained via several Kechris–Pestov–Todorcevic correspondences, by establishing the approximate Ramsey property for several classes of finite-dimensional Banach spaces and function systems and their versions with distinguished contractions. This is the first direct application of the Kechris–Pestov–Todorcevic correspondence in the setting of metric structures. The fundamental combinatorial principle that underpins the proofs is the Dual Ramsey Theorem of Graham and Rothschild.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.304
Threshold uncertainty score0.611

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the European Mathematical SocietySame topicAdvanced Topology and Set TheoryFrench-language works237,207