MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

A Pooled Safety Analysis from the Ustekinumab Crohnʼs Disease and Psoriatic Diseases Phase 2 and 3 Clinical Trial Programs: 2016 ACG Presidential Poster Award

2016· article· en· W2978323666 on OpenAlexaff
Bruce E. Sands, Subrata Ghosh, Willem J.S. deVilliers, Elyssa Ott, C Gasink, Yinghua Lang, Philippe Szapary, Doug Jacobstein, Brian Feagan

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicPsoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityRobarts Clinical TrialsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUstekinumabPsoriatic arthritisPsoriasisClinical trialConcomitantAdverse effectSafety profileInternal medicineIncidence (geometry)MedDRARandomized controlled trialSurgeryDiseaseDermatologyAdalimumabPharmacovigilance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Ustekinumab (UST) is a well-established therapy in psoriasis (PsO) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) with up to 5 years safety experience from psoriasis clinical trials with 3117 pts & 8998 patient years (PY) of follow-up. However, limited safety data have been presented in Crohn's disease (CD). In pts with CD, Phase 2/3 data show that UST is safe & effective. Herein we present CD safety results & compare these with the safety profile in psoriatic diseases. Methods: Safety data from 5 CD (2 Ph2/3Ph3) trials were analyzed with the previously reported PsO (1 Ph2/3Ph3) & PsA (1 Ph2/2 Ph3) randomized controlled trials. All psoriatic pts received UST 45 or 90mg SC; Ph3 CD pts received a single IV UST induction dose of 130mg or ˜6 mg/kg followed by 90mg SC q8 or q12 wks. In PsO trials, no concurrent treatment was permitted; concomitant MTX was permitted in PsA trials & concomitant immunomosuppressives & corticosteroids were permitted in CD trials. All pts who received ≥1 dose of UST were included. Safety outcomes are presented as events per 100 PYs. Results: Through the PBO-control period across all indications, 3636 pts were treated with UST (1582 PsO, 692 PsA & 1362 CD). Treated pts with ≥1 reported event PBO vs UST in pooled indications (incidence/100 PY of f/u): AEs 556.1 vs594.3; SAEs 19.5 vs16.4; infections 135.8 vs138.1; serious infections 2.9 vs 3.3; MACE 0.26 vs 0.60; malignancies 0.26 vs 0.12; deaths 0 vs 0.12. Through 1 year, 5884 pts were treated with UST (3117 PsO, 1018 PsA, & 1749 CD) with 4521 PY of follow-up. Rates of AEs, SAEs, infection/serious infection were similar between UST group and PBO (Table) across the pooled indications. Event rates in the combined CD studies were also similar between treatment groups (PBO & UST groups) with overall AEs, & infections occurring more frequently in CD pts. Conclusion: UST has a favorable safety profile in CD with IV induction dosing up to 6mg/kg & SC maintenance dosing up to 90mg q8wks. Evaluation of the CD experience did not alter the safety profile of UST previously defined in pts with psoriatic disease treated with up to 5 years of therapy.Table 1: Key safety events through 1yr of follow-up

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.027
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.022
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.143

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0270.022
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.013
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology→Same topicPsoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis→French-language works237,207→