Succinate decreases bladder function in a rat model associated with metabolic syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS: Succinate and its receptor, GPR91, have been implicated in different aspects of metabolic syndrome. As GPR91 is expressed in the urinary bladder, the aim of this study is to show the effect of chronically increased succinate levels on bladder function. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Healthy Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats and hypertensive Dahl rats received an intraperitoneal injection of either saline or succinate (50 mg/kg) daily for a period of 4 weeks. Conscious cystometry was performed at the end of this period. Bladders were collected and used for contractility studies and morphological assessment. Two-way ANOVA was performed to compare between the two strains and student t-tests to compare treatment groups within each strain. RESULTS: Compared to SD rats, Dahl rats showed signs of bladder dysfunction. Succinate treatment led to higher urinary succinate levels and lower bladder capacities compared to saline-treated animals. In SD rats, this was associated with higher collagen content, lower GPR91 expression and an altered bladder nerve profile in the bladder. In succinate-treated Dahl rats, detrusor contractility was reduced and associated with decreased cholinergic innervation and increased collagen content. CONCLUSIONS: It is suggested that succinate negatively affects bladder function via effects through its receptor, GPR91, and that its effects are enhanced in the presence of metabolic disturbance. These findings contribute to our understanding of the pathophysiology of bladder dysfunction, specifically in a metabolic syndrome setting.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".