P11.39 Chloroquine as an anti-glioblastoma therapeutic: repurposing of an old drug
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract BACKGROUND Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive type of primary brain tumour in adults. These tumours depict anarchic proliferation and brain infiltration as well as radio- and chemoresistant profiles. The complete surgical resection is unachievable and responses to standard therapy are transitory. Recurrence is thus inevitable and patient prognosis is generally less than 15 months. Transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) holds a substantial role in supporting the GBM phenotype. We showed that TGF-β 1 expression levels correlate with overall and progression-free survival in newly diagnosed GBM patient. We also observed that chloroquine (CQ) can reduce the production of TGF-β together with proliferation, invasion, radioresistance and radio-induced invasion in vitro. Unfortunately, little is known regarding the ability of CQ to penetrate the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Therefore, our objective is to determine whether intravenous (IV) or intra-arterial (IA) infusions of CQ and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), a pharmacological analog of CQ, can yield therapeutic brain concentrations. MATERIAL AND METHODS To assess BBB penetration, the brain, plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations of CQ/HCQ were measured by LCMS/MS at different timepoints post-IV or post-IA infusions with 20 mg/kg of CQ/HCQ in tumour-free Wistar rat. For the survival studies, We implanted 10’000 F98 murin glioblastoma cells in the right putamen of Fischer rats. Ten days post-implantation, IA and IV infusion were accomplished through cannulations of the external right carotid and tail vein respectively. RESULTS With IV injections, CQ/HCQ brain concentrations 15 minutes post-injection reached 15.76 mg/g (0.18 µM) and 1.67 mg/g (0.078 µM) respectively. However, following IA infusions, we observed a 1.74 and 20.9 fold increase (20 mg/kg HCQ) as well as 7.1 and 84.7-fold-increase (20 mg/kg CQ) in contra- and ipsilateral brain concentrations respectively. Although brain concentrations gradually decreased over time post-IA infusions, the ipsilateral hemisphere CQ concentration was still 82.81 mg/g (34.52 µM) after 6 hours. Whereas plasma concentrations were very similar following IV and IA infusions, both molecules barely accumulated in the CSF and only when using IA infusions. The median survival of the control group (IA phosphate-buffered saline) and the group treated with 20 mg/kg CQ IV were 23.5 days and 24.5 days respectively. However, rats injected with 20 mg/kg CQ IA had a median survival of 28.5 days. CONCLUSION These results suggest that IA CQ could be used to abrogate the GBM phenotype. As TGF-β is associated with resistance to both radio- and chemotherapy, we plan to characterize the combination of IA infusions of CQ in combination with radiation or chemotherapy (carboplatin).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".