MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2978539942 · doi:10.35254/bhu.2019.47.9

«Манас» эпосундагы тулпарлардын образдарына карата жиктелиши жана алардын көркөм функциясы

2019· article· ky· W2978539942 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ж. Өмүралиева

Bibliographic record

VenueVestnik Bishkek Humanities University · 2019
Typearticle
Languageky
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistic research and analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFolkloreHEROEPICCharacter (mathematics)Quarter (Canadian coin)Order (exchange)Epoch (astronomy)HistoryLiteratureArtComputer scienceMathematicsArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Аннотация: Жалпы эле ат жалында казан аскан көчмөн элдердин фольклордук чыгармаларында негизги каармандын чыныгы баатыр деген атак-даңкка конуп, элдин үмүт-тилегин актап, жалпы элдик идеяны жүзөгө ашырыш үчүн баатырдын эң негизги эки нерсеге ээ болушу шарт. Алар: баатыр-каармандын өзүнө ылайык минген аты жана согуштук курал-жарагы. Биздин максат дагы бир жолу аттын көчмөн-баатырдык доордогу ордун баса белгилөө жана «Манас» эпосунун төрт вариантындагы жалпы тулпарларга илимий талдоо жүргүзүү. Тактап айтканда, тулпарлардын санын тактоо, жиктештирүү жана варианттардагы айрым өзгөчөлүктөргө анализ жасоо болуп саналат. Сагынбай Орозбаковдун варианты- СОВ, Молдобасан Мусулманкуловдун варианты- ММВ, Багыш Сазановдун варианты -БСВ, Шапак Рысмендеевдин варианты- ШРВ деп кыскартылып берилди. Түйүндүү сөздөр: аттар, тулпарлар, күлүктөр, баатырлар, аргымак, жылкы. Аннотация: В фольклорных произведениях кочевого народа, который ел и пил не слезая с лошади, для того, чтобы основной герой приобрел славу как настоящий батыр и оправдал чаяния народа, осуществляя народную идею, ему необходимо было владеть двумя основными вещами. Это его конь, соответствующий самому герою – батыру и боевое оружие. Нашей целью является еще раз подчеркнуть место лошади в кочевую-героическую эпоху и проведение научного анализа всем боевым коням в четырех вариантах эпоса “Манас”. Точнее, уточнение количества боевых коней, распределение их, проведение анализа отдельным особенностям в вариантах. Вариант Сагымбая Орозбакова сокращенно дан как СОВ, вариант Молдобасана Мусулманкулова - ММВ, вариант Багыша Сазанова - БСВ и вариант Шапака Рысмендеева - ШРВ. Ключевые слова: кони, образы боевых коней, скакуны, батыры, аргамаки, лошадь. Summary: In the folklore works of the nomadic people who ate and drank not getting down from horses, in order to gain fame like a real batyr and to justify the aspirations of the people thus implementing the popular idea, the main character needs to own two basic things. These things are his horse fitting the hero-batyr himself and the weapon of war. Our goal is to once again emphasize the place of the horse in the nomadic-heroic epoch and to conduct a scientific analysis of all the war horses in four versions of the epic “Manas”. More precisely, we intend to specify the number of war horses, to classify them, to analyse individual features in the versions. The variant by Sagymbay Orozbakov is abbreviated as “СОВ” (Russian), the variant by Moldobasan Musulmankulov – as “ММВ” (Russian), the variant by Bagysh Sazanov – as “БСВ” (Russian) and the variant by Shapak Rysmendеev – as “ШРВ” (Russian). Keywords: horses, images of warhorses, quarter horses, batyrs, argamaks, steed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.847
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0500.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVestnik Bishkek Humanities UniversitySame topicLinguistic research and analysisFrench-language works237,207