MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Complication Rate of Palliative Colonic Stenting for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

2015· article· en· W2978543387 on OpenAlexaff
Hugo Bernard, Galab Mahamoud-Hassan, Annie Beaudoin, Jean-Daniel Baillargeon

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicColorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de SherbrookeUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePerforationStentSurgeryColorectal cancerPopulationBevacizumabPalliative careRadiologyCancerInternal medicineChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Some patient with metastatic colorectal cancer present colonic obstruction by their primary tumor. Palliative colonic stenting is associated with risks of colonic perforation, death and risk is probably increased with anti-VEGF. We reviewed our procedures and complications to confirm benefit with acceptable risks in our local population. Methods: We reviewed the files of all patients with colonic stenting with self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) between January 2005 and March 2014. Stenting of benign stenosis or bridge to surgery were excluded. Results: Colonic stents were used as palliation in 128 patients; 127 had metastatic colorectal cancer and 1 had locally advanced non-resectable sigmoid cancer. Our population comprise 89 women and 39 men (70|30%) with mean age of 76 (43 to 93 year-old). 31 (24%) patients were on chemotherapy before the procedure. Bevacizumab was utilised in a total of 8 patients.The procedure was considered technically successful in 120 (94%). Early major complications (≤ 7 days) were stent dysfunction 1/120, stent migration 3/120 and perforation 4/120. Within those, 3 patients recovered with medical treatment and, one developed overt haemorrhage and died in the week following urgent hemicolectomy. The one patient with early stent dysfunction had balloon dilatation and perforation ensued. The three patients with early stent migration had balloon dilation and deployment of a second stent, colonic perforation was recorded in all three with subsequent death. Total early complication rate was 7% (8/120) and early death rate was 4% (5/128). Reported late complications (> 7 days) were stent dysfunction 13/120 (11%) and no migration or perforation occurred. The perforation risk associated with stricture dilatation was 44% (4 early perforations in 9 balloon dilatations, all were fatal). The perforation rate with anti-VEGF was 63% (5 perforations in 8 patients on anti-VEGF) with 50% mortality (4/8). The perforation in anti-VEGF plus balloon dilatation is 100%(4/4) and is always fatal. Conclusion: The early major complication rate is 7% with a 4% death. The perforation and mortality of stent installation are marked in the group of bevacizumab, with balloon dilation and when these two factors were associated; with a 100% perforation and mortality. This outlines the importance of patient selection and appropriate intervention for optimal quality of care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of GastroenterologySame topicColorectal Cancer Surgical TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207