GEVA, Esther, Allan BARSKY and Fern WESTERNOFF, eds., <b>INTERPROFESSIONAL PRACTICE WITH DIVERSE POPULATIONS</b>
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
GEVA, Esther, Allan BARSKY and Fern WESTERNOFF, eds., INTERPROFESSIONAL PRACTICE WITH DIVERSE POPULATIONS. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Publishing Corp., Inc., 2000, 211pp., $67.50 hardcover.. A psychologist, a social worker, and a speech-language pathologist produced this edited volume. It is a casebook about interprofessional, diversity-informed practice. This text is designed to help students and professionals connect theory and practice in a way that is ....detailed, multifaceted, and realistic. The editors see this as an educational tool that can be used: * As a personal resource for practicing professionals; * As a primary textbook for advanced undergraduate and graduate courses on diversity and interprofessional practice; * As a casebook for professional development workshops, case discussions, and other forms of in-service training for various types of health, mental health, social welfare, and educational agencies and institutions; and * As a library resource for supplementary research and reading for students who do not use this book as a primary text. Chapter 1 looks at interprofessional practice in terms of team constituents and team dynamics and then analyzes the special issues that develop when clients come from diverse backgrounds. Chapters 2-9 look at different contexts of practice [mental health, neurological disorders, child abuse, education, addiction, and criminal justice]. The students, clients, and patients in the cases represent a range of ages, presenting problems, cultures, sexual orientations and genders, family dynamics, and other socioeconomic circumstances. A final chapter offers a summary of key issues and a case for readers to ponder in terms of interprofessional, diversity-informed perspectives. The editors hope that this casebook uses cases to bridge the gap between classroom theory and practice/implementation in the community. Interprofessional practice is also sometimes called multiprofessional or interdisciplinary practice. There are a number of axes along which diversity-informed practice takes place, such as culture, race, socioeconomic status, religion, mental and physical health status, gender, sexual orientation, language, and political identification. There are many challenges to this sort of very difficult and challenging research, and the editors list these challenges as power, politics, funding, territoriality, educational biases, humanistic concerns, and legal issues. The case studies that are used to illustrate interprofessional, diversity-informed practice are many and varied: the case of an African American woman with traumatic brain injury, the too-quiet adolescent, crisis intervention with a gay Irish American man, educational issues with a Vietnamese Canadian child, the case of a deaf Taiwanese youth, theft by a Cree woman and victim-offender mediation versus healing circle, the case of an Algerian adolescent with antisocial behavior, and neuropsychological and interprofessional practice with a Latina student with epilepsy. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it