MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2978562732 · doi:10.3138/jcfs.33.4.578

GEVA, Esther, Allan BARSKY and Fern WESTERNOFF, eds., <b>INTERPROFESSIONAL PRACTICE WITH DIVERSE POPULATIONS</b>

2002· article· en· W2978562732 on OpenAlex
Marcie Parker

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Comparative Family Studies · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicResearch in Social Sciences
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFernSociologyPsychologyBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

GEVA, Esther, Allan BARSKY and Fern WESTERNOFF, eds., INTERPROFESSIONAL PRACTICE WITH DIVERSE POPULATIONS. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Publishing Corp., Inc., 2000, 211pp., $67.50 hardcover.. A psychologist, a social worker, and a speech-language pathologist produced this edited volume. It is a casebook about interprofessional, diversity-informed practice. This text is designed to help students and professionals connect theory and practice in a way that is ....detailed, multifaceted, and realistic. The editors see this as an educational tool that can be used: * As a personal resource for practicing professionals; * As a primary textbook for advanced undergraduate and graduate courses on diversity and interprofessional practice; * As a casebook for professional development workshops, case discussions, and other forms of in-service training for various types of health, mental health, social welfare, and educational agencies and institutions; and * As a library resource for supplementary research and reading for students who do not use this book as a primary text. Chapter 1 looks at interprofessional practice in terms of team constituents and team dynamics and then analyzes the special issues that develop when clients come from diverse backgrounds. Chapters 2-9 look at different contexts of practice [mental health, neurological disorders, child abuse, education, addiction, and criminal justice]. The students, clients, and patients in the cases represent a range of ages, presenting problems, cultures, sexual orientations and genders, family dynamics, and other socioeconomic circumstances. A final chapter offers a summary of key issues and a case for readers to ponder in terms of interprofessional, diversity-informed perspectives. The editors hope that this casebook uses cases to bridge the gap between classroom theory and practice/implementation in the community. Interprofessional practice is also sometimes called multiprofessional or interdisciplinary practice. There are a number of axes along which diversity-informed practice takes place, such as culture, race, socioeconomic status, religion, mental and physical health status, gender, sexual orientation, language, and political identification. There are many challenges to this sort of very difficult and challenging research, and the editors list these challenges as power, politics, funding, territoriality, educational biases, humanistic concerns, and legal issues. The case studies that are used to illustrate interprofessional, diversity-informed practice are many and varied: the case of an African American woman with traumatic brain injury, the too-quiet adolescent, crisis intervention with a gay Irish American man, educational issues with a Vietnamese Canadian child, the case of a deaf Taiwanese youth, theft by a Cree woman and victim-offender mediation versus healing circle, the case of an Algerian adolescent with antisocial behavior, and neuropsychological and interprofessional practice with a Latina student with epilepsy. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.116
Threshold uncertainty score0.925

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.372
GPT teacher head0.514
Teacher spread0.141 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it