The Relation of The Duration of Work in Dentists with Postural Problems, Range of Motion and Pain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı; diş hekimlerinde meslekte geçirilen süreye bağlı postür problemlerini belirleyerek, bu sürenin vücutta oluşan ağrı, servikal ve lumbal bölgedeki eklem hareket açıklıkları ile ilişkisinin ortaya koymaktır.Yöntemler: Araştırmaya 27'si erkek, 29'u kadın toplam 56 diş hekimi (yaş=29,55±9,5 yıl) gönüllü olarak katıldı.Demografik bilgi anketinin uygulandığı katılımcılar; çalışma yıllarına (0-4, 5-9 ve ≥10 yıl) ve gün içinde unit başında geçirdikleri süreye göre (0-5, 6-8 ve ≥9 saat) 3'er gruba; gün içinde ara vererek ve ara vermeden çalışma durumuna göre 2 gruba ayrıldı.Postür analizi ve servikal-lumbal bölge eklem hareket açıklığı ölçümleriyle var olan limitasyonlar belirlendi.Ağrıyı değerlendirmek için McGill Ağrı skalası anketi uygulandı.Gruplar arası farklılıkların belirlenmesinde Kruskal-Wallis ve Mann-Whitney U testleri; post hoc analizlerde ise Bonferroni düzeltmesi kullanıldı.Bulgular: Meslekte geçirilen sürenin fazlalığı ile orantılı olarak servikal ve lumbal eklem hareket açıklığının azaldığı, omurgada ve dizde postüral deformitelerin gözlendiği ve ağrı düzeyinin anlamlı bir şekilde arttığı görüldü.Ancak gün içinde unit başında geçen süreye göre yapılan analizlerde, sürenin artışı ile sadece servikal ve lumbal bölge eklem hareket açıklığında azalmaların varlığı belirlendi.Objective: The aim of this study is to determine the relationship between cervical and lumbar range of motions, pain and postural problems with the time spent in the occupation in dentists.Methods: A total of 56 dentists (27 males, 29 females), participated in this research as a volunteer (age=29.55±9.5 years).Firstly, the participants were divided into 3 groups according to the working years in their life and the time spent at unit during the day; they were also divided into 2 groups according to the intermittent or uninterrupted working conditions during the day.Cervical and lumbar joint range of motions were measured to determine limitations.The McGill pain scale survey was used to evaluate the pain.Kruskal Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests with a posthoc Bonferroni test were used for all statistical analyses.Results: It was seen that the cervical and lumbar joint range of motions decreased, and the postural deformities in the spine and knee were observed and the level of pain increased significantly in comparatively to the excess of the time spent in the profession.However, in the analysis according to the time spent at the unit during the day, only the decrease in the range of motion of the regions was determined with the increase of the time spent at the unit during the day.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".