Epigenetic regulation of protein translation in <i>KMT2A</i> -rearranged AML
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Inhibition of the histone methyl-transferase DOT1L (KMT4) has shown encouraging activity in preclinical models of KMT2A ( MLL) -rearranged leukemia. The DOT1L inhibitor pinometostat (EPZ5676) was well tolerated in early phase clinical trials and showed modest clinical activity, including occasional complete responses (CRs) as single agent. These studies support the development of combinatorial therapies for KMT2A -rearranged leukemias. Here, we investigated two novel combinations: dual inhibition of the histone methyltransferases DOT1L and EZH2, and the combination of a DOT1L inhibitor with the protein synthesis inhibitor homoharringtonine (HHR). EZH2 is the catalytic histone methyltransferase in the polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2), and inhibition of EZH2 has reported preclinical activity in KMT2A -rearranged leukemia. We found that the H3K79 and H3K27 methyl marks are not dependent on each other, and that DOT1L and EZH2 inhibition affect largely distinct gene expression programs. In particular, the KMT2A/DOT1L target HOXA9, which is commonly de-repressed as a consequence of PRC2 loss or inhibition in other contexts, was not re-activated upon dual DOT1L/EZH2 knockout or inhibition. Despite encouraging data in murine KMT2A-MLLT3 transformed cells suggesting synergy between DOT1L and EZH2 inhibition, we found both synergistic and antagonistic effects on a panel of human KMT2A rearranged cell lines. Combinatorial inhibition of DOT1L and EZH2 is thus not a promising strategy. We identified opposing effects on ribosomal gene transcription and protein translation by DOT1L and EZH2 as a mechanism that is partially responsible for observed antagonistic effects. The effects of DOT1L inhibition on ribosomal gene expression prompted us to evaluate the combination of EPZ5676 with a protein translation inhibitor. EPZ5676 was synergistic with the protein translation inhibitor homoharringtonine (HHR), supporting further preclinical/clinical development of this combination.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".