MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

A Case of Neurogenic Constipation Relieved with Prucalopride Succinate

2013· article· en· W2978668119 on OpenAlexaff
Hugo Bernard, Annie Beaudoin, Alain Watier

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastrointestinal motility and disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFecal impactionConstipationNeostigmineGastroenterologyAnesthesiaChronic constipationSurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: Prucalopride succinate is an enterokinetic of a new class, the dihydrobenzofurancarboxamide, with high affinity for 5-HT4 receptor. Its main action is to stimulate myenteric neurons to release acetylcholine, calcitonin gene related-peptide, and azote monoxide which result in an increase of intestinal contractility and peristalsis. This medication was proven efficient to treat chronic idiopathic constipation in three randomized-controlled trials. Considering the effects of prucalopride succinate on digestive motility, other utilizations come to mind. However, only one controlled double-blind pilot study of 11 patients with chronic constipation secondary to spinal cord trauma found an increased number of stool and a decreased transit time with prucalopride succinate. Only one case report was found on a 54-yearold man with acute pseudo-obstruction secondary to paraplegia treated with success with prucalopride 2 mg PO die where decompression colonoscopy, neostigmine and Prostigmine® proved inefficient. We encountered a similar case in our institution. A 68-year-old man presented for neoplastic spinal cord compression with progressive lower limb paresis and paresthesias over one week. He was found to suffer from IgA multiple myeloma with plasmacytoma and had emergent surgical decompression of his spinal cord. In the days following his surgery, he developed urinary and fecal retention with an increased abdominal volume and loss of appetite. An Ogilvie syndrome with a 10 cm right colonic distension was diagnosed fifteen days after his admission. At that moment, he was on narcotics for his recent spinal surgery, he was about to receive his third chemotherapy regimen (Velcade®/Decadron®) and was immobilized secondary to his lower limb paresis. He was on docusate 200 mg PO bid and bisacodyl 10 mg IR qd. He resumed partially his Ogilvie syndrome with neostigmine 2 mg IV and was then put on prucalopride succinate 2 mg PO qd for 3 days with incomplete bowel movement and persistent abdominal discomfort. Prucalopride succinate was increased to 4 mg PO qd with addition of Lax-A-Day® 17 g PO qd with satisfactory bowel movement and increased well-being and appetite. He passed stool regularly with resolution of his colonic distension. Ultimately, after a total of 16 days, he regained ambulation and the prucalopride succinate was stopped without recurrence of pseudo-obstruction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0080.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology→Same topicGastrointestinal motility and disorders→French-language works237,207→