MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Obstructive Sleep Apnea Awareness among Primary Care Physicians in Africa

2019· article· en· W2978743565 on OpenAlexaff
Ju-Wei Chang, Fatai Akemokwe, Diana Marangu, Blessings Chisunkha, Eshiobo Irekpita, G Obasikene, Jacqueline Kagima, Charles Obonyo

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of the American Thoracic Society · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and Immunity
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineKenyaInterquartile rangeReferralFamily medicineObstructive sleep apneaPediatricsCross-sectional studyPrimary careInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Rationale Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a significant health problem among adults and children globally, resulting in decreased quality of life and increased costs of healthcare. For optimal clinical care, primary care physicians should be familiar with OSA and confident in their ability to screen, diagnose, and manage this condition. Objectives To assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of primary care physicians in Kenya, Nigeria, and South Africa regarding OSA in adults and children. Methods We conducted a multicenter cross-sectional survey in Kenya (Nairobi), Nigeria (Edo State), and South Africa (Cape Town) between April 2016 and July 2017. At least 40 participants were randomly selected from a register of primary care physicians at each site. Potential participants were contacted to receive online/paper-based, validated OSA Knowledge and Attitudes (OSAKA) and OSAKA in Children (OSAKA-KIDS) questionnaires related to adults and children, respectively. The median percentage knowledge scores and proportions of favorable attitude were computed and current diagnostic and referral practices were documented. Results The median OSAKA knowledge scores were 83.3% (interquartile range [IQR], 77.8–88.9), 66.7% (IQR, 55.6–77.8), and 61.1% (IQR, 55.6–77.8) among South African, Kenyan, and Nigerian physicians, respectively. For OSAKA-KIDS, the median knowledge scores were 61.1% (IQR, 50.0–72.2), 64.2% (IQR, 35.3–93.2), and 58.3% (IQR, 44.4–66.7) among South African, Kenyan, and Nigerian physicians, respectively. Most physicians (90–94%) considered adult and pediatric OSA very/extremely important. Fewer physicians agreed/strongly agreed that they were confident about OSA diagnosis (55%), management (25%), and continuous positive airway pressure (18%) use in adults. Even fewer physicians agreed/strongly agreed that they were confident about pediatric OSA diagnosis (35%), management (21%), and continuous positive airway pressure use (18%). South African physicians mainly prescribed polysomnography (51%) and overnight oximetry (22%), whereas 49% of Nigerian physicians and 65% of Kenyan physicians commonly requested lateral cervical radiography. Conclusions Primary care physicians in South Africa, Nigeria, and Kenya considered OSA to be important but had modest knowledge about OSA in adults and children, and had a low perceived confidence in adult and pediatric management. Focused educational interventions during undergraduate training and continuing professional development programs may improve primary physicians’ knowledge about OSA and its diagnosis and management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.144
Threshold uncertainty score0.786

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of the American Thoracic SocietySame topicObstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchFrench-language works237,207