MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2978768631 · doi:10.31001/biomedika.v12i1.471

Prevalensi Hipertensi pada Pasien Diabetes Melitus di Kelurahan Mojosongo Kota Surakarta

2019· article· id· W2978768631 on OpenAlexaff
Ratna Herawati Prabowo

Bibliographic record

VenueBiomedika · 2019
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldMedicine
TopicPublic Health and Nutrition
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
FundersUniversitas Sam RatulangiUniversitas Sumatera UtaraUniversitas Indonesia
KeywordsMedicineGynecology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Diabetes Melitus merupakan suatu kelompok penyakit metabolik dengan karakteristik hiperglikemi .Penyakit Diabetes Melitus merupakan penyakit yang tidak dapat disembuhkan tetapi dapat dikendalikan. Tetapi jika penyakit ini tidak ditangani dengan baik akan timbul komplikasi, salah satu komplikasi makroangiopati pada DM adalah hipertensi, sehingga tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui prevalensi hipertensi pada pasien DM di wilayah Mojosongo Surakarta. Penelitian dilakukan di Puskesmas Sibela Surakarta, dengan subyek penelitian pasien DM sebanyak 50 orang. Desain penelitian pendekatancross sectional dengan tehnik purposive sampling . Instrumen penelitian yang digunakan adalah kuesioner dan alat spygnomanometer.Untuk mengetahui prevalensi digunakan pendekatan deskriptif. Pada hasil penelitian didapatkan adanya pasien DM yang juga terdiagnosa hipertensi. Prevalensi Hipertensi pada pasien DM sebanyak 14 orang ( 28 % ) dari 50 sampel, dimana jenis kelamin perempuan lebih banyak dibandingkan laki laki, yaitu sebanyak 11 orang ( 78,6 %). Sedangkan prevalensi berdasarkan umur didapatkan hasil bahwa sebagian besar berumur ≥ 61 tahun, yaitu sebanyak 8 orang ( 57,2 %). Untuk prevalensi berdasarkan lamanya menderita penyakit, didapatkan hasil bahwa sebanyak 9 orang ( 64,3%) telah menderita DM lebih dari 10 tahun. Adanya pasien DM yang disertai dengan hipertensi, dengan prevalensi sebesar 14 orang ( 28 %).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiomedikaSame topicPublic Health and NutritionFrench-language works237,207