MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Vasoactive Medications for the Treatment of Acute Variceal Bleeds: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2011· review· en· W2978939899 on OpenAlexaff
Malcolm Wells, Nilesh Chande, Melanie Beaton, Erin Boyce, Marko Mrkobrada

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2011
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicBlood donation and transfusion practices
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVasoactiveVasoactive intestinal peptideRandomized controlled trialVasopressinSomatostatinInternal medicineMeta-analysisAnesthesiaNeuropeptide

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: Vasoactive medications such as vasopressin, somatostatin and their analogues are commonly used for the treatment of acute variceal bleeds. We undertook a systematic review to determine the impact of vasoactive agents on mortality, transfusion requirements, rebleeding, arrest and control of bleeding and duration of hospital stay in patients having variceal bleeds. Methods: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of vasopressin, somatostatin and their analogues, administered to patients with acute variceal bleeds. We systematically searched nine electronic databases and examined multiple sources of grey literature for eligible trials. Two independent investigators assessed trial eligibility and abstracted data. Results: Our search identified 2978 citations, and 28 trials with 2444 patients met our eligibility criteria. Acute mortality rate within 7 days was 77/856 patients in the vasoactive agents vs. 102/843 patients in the control group (RR 0.76; 95% CI 0.58-1.00; p=0.05; I2=0%; moderate quality of evidence). Intermediate mortality rate (15-42 days) was 140/676 patients in the vasoactive agents vs. 181/678 patients in the control group (RR 0.80; 95% CI 0.64-1.00; p=0.05; I2=21%; moderate quality of evidence). Arrest of bleeding was obtained in 649/875 patients in the vasoactive agents group vs. 512/855 patients in the control group (RR 1.20; 95% CI 1.12-1.29; p<0.00001; I2=28%; very low quality of evidence). Transfusion requirements were lower in patients treated with vasoactive agents compared with patients in the control group (pooled mean difference -0.70 units of blood transfused, 95% CI -1.01 to -0.38; P<0.00001; I2=82%; moderate grade of evidence). Patients treated with vasoactive agents had a shorter hospital stay (mean difference -0.71 days; 95% CI -1.23 to -0.19; p=0.007; I2=0%; low grade of evidence).Table: Summary of findings: vasoactive agents for treatment of variceal hemorrhageFigure: Forest plot of acute all-cause mortality.Conclusion: In patients suffering an acute variceal bleed, a significantly lower rate of acute all-cause mortality, intermediate all-cause mortality, and transfusion requirements, as well as improved control of bleeding and shorter hospital stay was found in patients randomized to vasopressin, somatostatin and their analogues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.029
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.029
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0190.028
Bibliometrics0.0060.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of GastroenterologySame topicBlood donation and transfusion practicesFrench-language works237,207