MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2978992173 · doi:10.5459/bnzsee.42.2.129-141

The Mw 6.7 George Sound earthquake of October 15, 2007

2009· article· en· W2978992173 on OpenAlexaff
Tanja Petersen, John Ristau, John Beavan, Paul Denys, Mike Denham, Bryan Field, C. Francois-Holden, R. McCaffrey, N. Palmer, Martin Reyners, Sergey Samsonov, The GeoNet team

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicearthquake and tectonic studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologySeismologyAftershockSeismometerSubductionEpicenterFault planeFault (geology)Earthquake ruptureMoment tensorNorth American PlateSubmarine pipelineTectonicsOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Mw 6.7 George Sound earthquake of October 15, 2007, occurred only a few kilometres offshore of Fiordland, within a region where the subduction zone of the Australian Plate beneath the Pacific Plate intersects the offshore extension of the Alpine Fault. Rapid response deployments of portable seismographs, a strong motion recorder and GPS receivers relatively close to the epicentre soon after the main shock allowed us to relate the event to thrusting at the subduction interface. The main shock moment tensor solution places the event at a shallow depth of 21 km. The sequence of aftershocks that followed the main event presents predominantly reverse faulting mechanisms with depths of 20 to 25 km. Earthquake re-locations using data recorded by the portable seismometers reveal a cluster of aftershocks at 17 to 25 km. This cluster defines a steeply SE-dipping plane, while another cluster at about 7-12 km depth images a NW-dipping plane within the overlying plate. Preliminary results from the seismic, geodetic and near-field strong motion geophysical data are consistent with rupture on an east dipping fault plane, presumed to be the subduction interface.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.074
Threshold uncertainty score0.147

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake EngineeringSame topicearthquake and tectonic studiesFrench-language works237,207